Agree with you about JK and the negative slating he got from "fans" on here.billamend wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 02:17In the 2022 car reveal, Key mentioned how much they had worked on the suspension. Key might be conservative, but he was not on the mechanic side of the car. Also, he is not a aerodynamicist, he is a mechanical engineer, so that part obviously was something he cared about.
It was a good platform for last years development, mechanically speaking, other than the oddities about not being able to feel the road through the car. But he was here to manage the project of delivering a car that was fast in all regards and not to be an engineer.billamend wrote: ↑11 Feb 2024, 02:17In the 2022 car reveal, Key mentioned how much they had worked on the suspension. Key might be conservative, but he was not on the mechanic side of the car. Also, he is not a aerodynamicist, he is a mechanical engineer, so that part obviously was something he cared about.
I was not saying that Key was blameless. Just that on the mechanical part of the car, he seemingly did a good job. I agree with most of the complaints that we hear.mwillems wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 16:18Stella has spoken about the Aero aspect as being held back somewhat and that the decision making in the team was not optimal with some people not having voices. Zak had spoken about his own disappointment with the development of the car and not finding the time they would want, as well as disappointment with the two poor winters. So I think what was being called into question was not his ability as an engineer, but as the leader of all of the cars development and in particular the leader of a range of people and personalities.
Sounds like Key was a dead man walking in Zak's eyes from that point. And yet he still had enough confidence in him to deliver the 2023 car, so perhaps he only made the final decision when it came in below expectations.mwillems wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 16:18https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/mclar ... /10563690/
For me, the big moment was the French Grand Prix [in 2022] when we were late with our upgrades and they were ineffective”
“The reaction from the leadership was not the reaction I would have expected. That was also at the same time when you start to develop [the following season's] car.
“So that was the big moment for me, and obviously we made the changes at the end of the year.
This was a reaction to both Key and Seidl.
Yeah he was on the nose with elements of the chassis, Stella paid tribute to the chassis, stating that without a good chassis the car would not have been as "upgradeable" as it was.billamend wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 18:14I was not saying that Key was blameless. Just that on the mechanical part of the car, he seemingly did a good job. I agree with most of the complaints that we hear.mwillems wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 16:18Stella has spoken about the Aero aspect as being held back somewhat and that the decision making in the team was not optimal with some people not having voices. Zak had spoken about his own disappointment with the development of the car and not finding the time they would want, as well as disappointment with the two poor winters. So I think what was being called into question was not his ability as an engineer, but as the leader of all of the cars development and in particular the leader of a range of people and personalities.
Your point doesn't make sense, Key implemented the pull rod front suspension on the initial 2022 McLaren already since the beginning of the regulations.Espresso wrote: ↑10 Feb 2024, 20:37When I read this I’m happy he left the office.Key explained why a pull-rod configuration is trickier to perfect than a more conventional configuration.
Key expects more teams to adopt pull-rod front suspension
“In terms of the challenge, it’s definitely not what you’d do if you had a free hand at suspension design in its own right,” he said. “It’s very difficult. Everything’s kind of the wrong way around compared to a push-rod.
Stuck to a principle and not understanding why teams start to use a pull rod -or- open to accept other solutions might be better…
Source:
https://www.racefans.net/2024/02/09/a-h ... uspension/
Exactly, and he said even back then how much of a risk it was.JordanMugen wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 20:59Your point doesn't make sense, Key implemented the pull rod front suspension on the initial 2022 McLaren already since the beginning of the regulations.Espresso wrote: ↑10 Feb 2024, 20:37When I read this I’m happy he left the office.Key explained why a pull-rod configuration is trickier to perfect than a more conventional configuration.
Key expects more teams to adopt pull-rod front suspension
“In terms of the challenge, it’s definitely not what you’d do if you had a free hand at suspension design in its own right,” he said. “It’s very difficult. Everything’s kind of the wrong way around compared to a push-rod.
Stuck to a principle and not understanding why teams start to use a pull rod -or- open to accept other solutions might be better…
Source:
https://www.racefans.net/2024/02/09/a-h ... uspension/
Makes u wonder how Daniel might have lived in that 2023 McL.djos wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 22:47The mechanical package under Key was never the issue. The issue was him ignoring PP and forcing his own flawed aero concepts onto the car. Lando complained year after year that the car behaved differently from corner to corner, lap to lap and was ignored.
TBH, I think it took Daniel being unable to live with with the car to highlight how serious the issues were and force Zak to restructure the team without Key.
I think maybe the days of engineers being sole technical directors are over. Aero is now Key (pun intended) and therefore Aerodynamicists need to ultimately take the lead, hence McLaren now having 2 aero TD's. Key was a casualty of this decisionZynerji wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 23:07Makes u wonder how Daniel might have lived in that 2023 McL.djos wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 22:47The mechanical package under Key was never the issue. The issue was him ignoring PP and forcing his own flawed aero concepts onto the car. Lando complained year after year that the car behaved differently from corner to corner, lap to lap and was ignored.
TBH, I think it took Daniel being unable to live with with the car to highlight how serious the issues were and force Zak to restructure the team without Key.
While the 23 car was a big improvement, some of Lando’s comments hinted that the issues weren’t gone, the car was just more predictable. We all saw it bite him a few times in qualifying.Zynerji wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 23:07Makes u wonder how Daniel might have lived in that 2023 McL.djos wrote: ↑12 Feb 2024, 22:47The mechanical package under Key was never the issue. The issue was him ignoring PP and forcing his own flawed aero concepts onto the car. Lando complained year after year that the car behaved differently from corner to corner, lap to lap and was ignored.
TBH, I think it took Daniel being unable to live with with the car to highlight how serious the issues were and force Zak to restructure the team without Key.