Both Redbull and McLaren using the midwing and talking about bringing the real car later
Zeropods all over again
- Login or Register
No account yet? Sign up
Unlikely!
... if you can come up with a decent concept then develop it year after year until either the regulations change or you realise it was the wrong route. That, for me, is the most fruitful way to work.
Conversely, you do see cars where there seems to be no continuity. The shape is different from the year before, and different again the year after. The team is confused and doesn't properly understand the car.
This will certainly be a quote to remember...Mostlyeels wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 07:43Concerning "visually wild" new designs, there's a great quote from Adrian Newey's book.
... if you can come up with a decent concept then develop it year after year until either the regulations change or you realise it was the wrong route. That, for me, is the most fruitful way to work.
Conversely, you do see cars where there seems to be no continuity. The shape is different from the year before, and different again the year after. The team is confused and doesn't properly understand the car.
He nailed it alright!Mostlyeels wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 07:43Concerning "visually wild" new designs, there's a great quote from Adrian Newey's book.
... if you can come up with a decent concept then develop it year after year until either the regulations change or you realise it was the wrong route. That, for me, is the most fruitful way to work.
Conversely, you do see cars where there seems to be no continuity. The shape is different from the year before, and different again the year after. The team is confused and doesn't properly understand the car.
Not thinking of Mercedes at all.Mostlyeels wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 07:43Concerning "visually wild" new designs, there's a great quote from Adrian Newey's book.
... if you can come up with a decent concept then develop it year after year until either the regulations change or you realise it was the wrong route. That, for me, is the most fruitful way to work.
Conversely, you do see cars where there seems to be no continuity. The shape is different from the year before, and different again the year after. The team is confused and doesn't properly understand the car.
Yep! I’m amazed they didn’t change the driver location last year - ignoring Hamiltons feedback likely cost them his services.BMMR61 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 09:06Not thinking of Mercedes at all.Mostlyeels wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 07:43Concerning "visually wild" new designs, there's a great quote from Adrian Newey's book.
... if you can come up with a decent concept then develop it year after year until either the regulations change or you realise it was the wrong route. That, for me, is the most fruitful way to work.
Conversely, you do see cars where there seems to be no continuity. The shape is different from the year before, and different again the year after. The team is confused and doesn't properly understand the car.
Thanks.
Yeah I was a bit surprised aswell, although they were using the other pits and doing the national circuit config…which maybe made it harder to spot.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 11:50Strangely seems there are no spy shots. Only stuff McLaren released which is hand picked to not reveal anything.
There were a few reflections of the car caught on video, but not that you can make out much from the reflections.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑15 Feb 2024, 11:50Strangely seems there are no spy shots. Only stuff McLaren released which is hand picked to not reveal anything.