Emag wrote: ↑23 Mar 2024, 14:36I believe the downforce is not important during rotation but rather the initial slowdown and brake application. With more aero load you have better braking, but more importantly on these types of corners is that you get more rotation during the initial phase of trail braking. This is crucial for time gain. As Mario Andretti used to say "I am amazed that drivers still think the brakes are for slowing the car down".
This is of course no longer true with modern drivers, as each of them is a master of the technique albeit at different levels, but I feel like most of general fans are not aware that the brakes are a very 'powerful' tool that allows the driver to control the pitch and the weight balance of the car, making the rear light and more prone to rotate while giving the fronts more load. Of course, overdo it and you lock up, or spin the car around. So it's not really easy finding the right balance each corner.
Anyway, the point is, with more peak downforce you have more initial rotation during this crucial and delicate turn-in point. Then the downforce "washes-off" as speed is scrubbed and it's down to the mechanical platform/grip to keep the car pointing in that direction.
This is what I believe enables the drivers to go faster on slower corners with a higher-downforce setup.
In the shorter corners you are bang on. But it's the longer corners where we suffer and here it stops being a corner entry issue. Though I think downforce in low speed in all areas of the corner is sub optimal, long and short.
According to the team, rear grip is the most improved aspect of the car, mainly in med speed but it has improved everywhere. I think at Bahrain Stella stated it isn't an issue with the rear it is overall downforce in the low speed, and in the previous article i posted he talks about the front being the key to our low speed issues due to the car not managing airflow well at the front.
We are going to find out very soon I hope and whomever is right, I hope we get on the top step