That's incorrect, Resta was working for Ferrari throughout 2017. He went to Alfa in 2018.
That's incorrect, Resta was working for Ferrari throughout 2017. He went to Alfa in 2018.
This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 14:41Let's see the cars made under Binotto as Technical Director:
- SF71H --> Good (ruined by last upgrade package which made it slower)
- SF 90 --> Garbage despite an overpowered engine which was declared "illegal"
- SF 1000 --> One of the worst Ferrari of all time
- SF 21 ---> Terrible
- F1 75 --> Good for half of 2022, mediocre after
- SF 23 --> Terrible
2018 Ferrari was a legit championship contender.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:28This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 14:41Let's see the cars made under Binotto as Technical Director:
- SF71H --> Good (ruined by last upgrade package which made it slower)
- SF 90 --> Garbage despite an overpowered engine which was declared "illegal"
- SF 1000 --> One of the worst Ferrari of all time
- SF 21 ---> Terrible
- F1 75 --> Good for half of 2022, mediocre after
- SF 23 --> Terrible
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
Agreed.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:442018 Ferrari was a legit championship contender.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:28This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 14:41
Let's see the cars made under Binotto as Technical Director:
- SF71H --> Good (ruined by last upgrade package which made it slower)
- SF 90 --> Garbage despite an overpowered engine which was declared "illegal"
- SF 1000 --> One of the worst Ferrari of all time
- SF 21 ---> Terrible
- F1 75 --> Good for half of 2022, mediocre after
- SF 23 --> Terrible
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
2022 Ferrari could have been as well, not to mention how innovative it was.
That's better than 'good'.
And calling a front running, race winning car like SF90 'garbage' simply cuz it wasn't a championship contender takes some serious dishonesty. Anybody saying stuff like this should be instantly dismissed and isn't here for constructive, objective discussion.
Absolutely! Those are exactly my wishes for the weekend.Sphere3758 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:48All I want to see is Leclerc have a clean qualifying and race. I am still unsure on what the gap between Redbull and Ferrari really is
We are talking about Ferrari, therefore the expectations are much higher. Moreover, for the 2022 season Ferrari also had a massive advantage in terms of budget and wind tunnel hours compared to RB.This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
SF90 wasn't a bad car when taking the engine into account, but the chassis was pretty bad. Slow-speed corner deficit was simply obscene.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:44And calling a front running, race winning car like SF90 'garbage' simply cuz it wasn't a championship contender takes some serious dishonesty. Anybody saying stuff like this should be instantly dismissed and isn't here for constructive, objective discussion.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:28This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.Xyz22 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 14:41
Let's see the cars made under Binotto as Technical Director:
- SF71H --> Good (ruined by last upgrade package which made it slower)
- SF 90 --> Garbage despite an overpowered engine which was declared "illegal"
- SF 1000 --> One of the worst Ferrari of all time
- SF 21 ---> Terrible
- F1 75 --> Good for half of 2022, mediocre after
- SF 23 --> Terrible
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
An absolutely awful chassis which was only decent in high speed corners and carried by an overpowered engine. Morevoer the performance in race trim was even worse compared to qualifying with tracks like Hungary, China, Spain where the car was close to 1s slower.CouncilorIrissa wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 17:08SF90 wasn't a bad car when taking the engine into account, but the chassis was pretty bad. Slow-speed corner deficit was simply obscene.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:44And calling a front running, race winning car like SF90 'garbage' simply cuz it wasn't a championship contender takes some serious dishonesty. Anybody saying stuff like this should be instantly dismissed and isn't here for constructive, objective discussion.Cs98 wrote: ↑18 Apr 2024, 15:28This has nothing to do with Merc so moving it.
I spot 4 race winning cars in there, 5 pole sitting cars, a couple of contendors, and that's before we get to the fact you omitted the SF70H which Binotto oversaw as TD. I don't know what the obsession is with denigrating ex-employees unfairly, just creates a toxic environment.
I always have flashbacks to this comparison when people talk about the SF90. Look at the third sector
With the power advantage Ferrari enjoyed in 2019, any remotely competent chassis should've at least been in the championship fight. Given that power advantage was achieved through dodgy means, it paints a pretty grim picture.
I'm 99.9% certain it's completely out of reach. Track has been worked on a lot, most of the bumps have been ground down (at least this is reported) and it's gonna be a cool weekend overall. All of that works to Red Bulls strengths.