It's not, unless someone has an obscure stat nobody knows about.
Just a bit more of the possible over hype.
It's not, unless someone has an obscure stat nobody knows about.
Because he expects Antonelli to become a future world champion. Kind of like Verstappen making his debut.
"...seeding doubt in another one's sense of reality." Selective quoting part of a definition there.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑30 Aug 2024, 00:43I am using the word correctly. Not surprisingly, your post is another attempt at gas-lighting...PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑29 Aug 2024, 09:53First off. Look up gas-lightong, you're using it wrong.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑29 Aug 2024, 04:41
Ahem. Please stop gas-lighting the thread, thank you.
I don't know about the toxicity you speak of. It's actually the most peaceful of the major team threads when you look at actual supporters of the team.
If you think there is no toxicity in this thread, may I politely suggest you reread it. The heard is full of LH and GR fans spouting vitriol about the other driver trying to win the intrateam top trumps competition. It's the same over in the McLaren thread with LN and OP fans arguing instead of celebrating their team's success.
It IS toxic and adds nothing to the discussion.
You are seeding doubt in another one's sense of reality.
If you check it. None of the true Mercedes fans are starting or entertaining toxic discussions. We tend to shut down or ignore the attempts.
It's not. But just like the word "iconic" gets overused for things that are not iconic, same thing happens with historic.