The focus should be on both, issue being that if they had held firm from the start they would have probably had a 1 and 2, and taken points away from Ferrari. They lost points to them in the end, and an upgraded Ferrari will challenge at all races.
We do not know that it will challenge at all races. It's Monza, a track where Ferrari always aim to do well.
If Lando is weak, then Oscar, who loses to him, is generally incompetent.mwillems wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 10:32We do not know that it will challenge at all races. It's Monza, a track where Ferrari always aim to do well.
I'm surprised they didn't place a rule based on whomever get's to T1 first, but they didn't, and so one driver did his job better than the other. I think it is Ferrari that surprised Mclaren more than the gap to Verstappen. They may have got complacent there.
If Lando wins the WDC this year, he will be one of the weakest world champions in the sport.
His smile in the pre ceremony interview to me is saying that we will see a different Norris from now on. Im not speaking for better driving but more ruthless driving if MCLaren doesnt sit down and think.SiLo wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 10:52Mclaren need to stop reacting to other teams so desperately. Piastri had a good gap to Leclerc, so could easily have stayed out, and still had gap to Norris so was never under threat of losing 1st. Pitting him just made zero sense.
Norris also needs to sort his first laps out, I don't know what he is doing at the moment but its not working.
If Piastri doesn't nearly take both cars out at the 4th corner on the 1st lap (experienced F1 drivers on commentary described it as a lunge) then he and Lando can control their pace at the front protect their tyres and manage a 1 stop, or even a 2 stop but without stopping as early as they did.
I don't know if we watched the same race, but what makes you think that Lando would be able to do 1 stop? I mean he was in front of LEC in 2nd stint and still ate his fronts? He didn't had enough speed to charge into distance with PIA and LEC behind.PapayaFan481 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 12:19If Piastri doesn't nearly take both cars out at the 4th corner on the 1st lap (experienced F1 drivers on commentary described it as a lunge) then he and Lando can control their pace at the front protect their tyres and manage a 1 stop, or even a 2 stop but without stopping as early as they did.
The team then gets a 1-2 instead of a 2-3 and closes the gap to RBR even more.
That is what is frustrating. Oscar seemed to put himself above the team.
One day Oscar might need Lando to support his title challenge and I think he is burning that bridge this year.
We have potentially the strongest driver lineup on the grid, but I don't see it lasting. Max will leave RBR if their current trend continues and I think either Lando or Oscar goes there if this continues.
Hopefully harmony can be restored.
Otherwise hopefully Oscar goes, for no other reason than we can then reunite Carlando
I think that stint on mediums at the start was strong for both McLaren drivers. If you remember, Norris was about to pass Leclerc when he went to undercut him. If McLaren were in 1-2 they would have built a gap to Leclerc which would make undercut not a possibility for Leclerc. This would likely mean all of them go longer (probably to at least Sainz pit window) or even later.
Any reason as to why?Lucky wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 10:47If Lando is weak, then Oscar, who loses to him, is generally incompetent.mwillems wrote: ↑02 Sep 2024, 10:32We do not know that it will challenge at all races. It's Monza, a track where Ferrari always aim to do well.
I'm surprised they didn't place a rule based on whomever get's to T1 first, but they didn't, and so one driver did his job better than the other. I think it is Ferrari that surprised Mclaren more than the gap to Verstappen. They may have got complacent there.
If Lando wins the WDC this year, he will be one of the weakest world champions in the sport.