Mosin123 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2024, 11:30
Quantum wrote: ↑03 Sep 2024, 11:05
Mosin123 wrote: ↑03 Sep 2024, 10:43
How would you know how a car feels, or its handling, or any thing, until you drive it? Am quite curious here. a driver cant give any feedback on a car they have yet to drive.
Exactly. Hence Chicken and egg.
And why driver feedback is bloviated, overrated mess of a metric to attribute to a driver as some mystical superpower.
You can't measure it. It exists after the fact of a car being designed and built.
So why are cars not stepping out in FP1 every time already perfectly set up, why do they keep changing the set up of the car? why do they spend hours upon hours in the sim perfecting said set up?
Hmm, driver feed back.....
Why is the status quo pretty much the same every race weekend then?
Nothing wrong with extracting the most of a your base, everyone spends hours changing the set up of the car.
It is limited to the base you begin with, as in the total performance potential intrinsically in the car. You try get as close to that as possible. [Edit] And that window will vary for every team, at various intervals (updates, weather, track surface etc). Is there a team that has a driver that cannot set up a car? There have been famous examples in the past of drivers being lost at specific venues. Hamilton taking Button's set ups for example. It's not a linear thing and is a secondary to the base car you start a weekend with. If it wasn't, you wouldn't get McLaren winning races consistently and Red Bull before that. If it was
best set up bros, you'd have a lottery weekend wouldn't you?
Suggesting that set up changes can somehow catapult a team beyond the ultimate performance cap of it's car, well that's a novel one. Maybe you could cite consistent examples and forward a CV onto Red Bull?