While I agree that it is better for the sport and entertainment value, you have to take into account that the person leading the championship is a Numero Uno driver who dominates against his teammate, if there was any doubt in pace or championship or Perez ended up ahead they would switch them around immediately.BMMR61 wrote: ↑05 Sep 2024, 01:21I know the blunt part of what you don't want to happen again but the reasons we have a great championship are several.
There are 7 drivers from 4 teams who have been winning, not 4 numero uno drivers battling for wins.
There are 4 teams who are so close in average performance that at each track there is a different team that is fastest, and not by a lot.
If all teams impose Schumacher-style driver orders the spectacle is....let's see, like Austria 2002 "move over Rubens" and the crowd riots. Joe Saward articulates my point perfectly on today's Missed Apex podcast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w24aOGwxZQ (around 39.00)
"It devalues the drivers championship by winning it with team orders". He did provide a number of exclusions to this which I think are appropriate today.
Moving over like Rubens was forced to do was a foolish thing to do. Ferrari was already well ahead and looked stronger then other teams. Team order that early was not needed. But if it was in the second half of the season, Kimi or David are ahead 70 points and only realistic chance of catching them is to priorities Michael, you can be sure most teams would have done it and the uproar wouldn't be near as hard as in Austria for Rubens.
I am not advocating for Piastri to be told to wave Lando through every time, but the team could have some common sense to do that in specific circumstances. Lando after all did let Piastri through in Hungary after team unnecessarily undercut Piastri.