However, if a team successfully passes all deflection tests and adheres to the regulations and technical directives, they are deemed to be in full compliance, and no further action will be taken.
However, if a team successfully passes all deflection tests and adheres to the regulations and technical directives, they are deemed to be in full compliance, and no further action will be taken.
AD21 was blatantly against everything, but they manipulated the race 'for the show' and simply dismissed any protest.
A statement read: “The FIA is closely monitoring the flexibility of bodywork on all cars and reserves the right to request teams to make modifications at any point during the season.
“However, if a team successfully passes all deflection tests and adheres to the regulations and technical directives, they are deemed to be in full compliance and no further action will be taken.
“The FIA is currently reviewing data and any additional evidence that has emerged from the Baku GP and is considering any mitigating measures for future implementation.
“This is part of the standard process when scrutineering technical legality and the FIA retains the authority to introduce regulatory changes during the season if required.”
The whole rear wing structure leans back on the RB and despite the distance between yellow and red lines being similar, the camera on the bull is further away, or at least the aperture creates that perspective, so the AoA "lean" was greater on the Bull and affected DRS flap and the main plane. Not quite apples and oranges, but not apples and apples either.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑19 Sep 2024, 11:35It's nice to get an official confirmation that case 1 from 2021 is not ok, but case 2 from 2024 is now very much ok
https://preview.redd.it/w1cu657vyyy61.p ... 3b475066f1
https://i.ibb.co/Hqdrm28/mcl-baku-24.jpg
Can we, the general observers, judge that? Didn't appear to be any public domain details sufficient to see what that was, unless I completely missed/mistook that example.