I would be curious about those 2 1:39s in LEC’s pace. That’s probably traffic.Luscion wrote:
I would be curious about those 2 1:39s in LEC’s pace. That’s probably traffic.Luscion wrote:
They all had boat load of traffic. Very few laps were clean.dialtone wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 16:37I would be curious about those 2 1:39s in LEC’s pace. That’s probably traffic.Luscion wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GX7RZZJXsAA ... name=large
Fair but they are 2 of the 3 slowest lap among ALL the laps in the image. They look like outliers to me to remove.Dunlay wrote:They all had boat load of traffic. Very few laps were clean.dialtone wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 16:37I would be curious about those 2 1:39s in LEC’s pace. That’s probably traffic.Luscion wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GX7RZZJXsAA ... name=large
Thank you!
Much better.Luscion wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 16:48Charles' race pace if you remove those two laps
https://preview.redd.it/fp2-top-4-teams ... f65ff2d356
Well there's always a line where your race pace/tire life could be so devastating that you'd be guaranteed to get no points no matter where you start on the grid.
How is that possible? I thought Singapore was Max downforce. Isn't it possible that Racing Bulls just turned down the PU in the race sims? Honda's reliability this year has been questionable. They probably need to be cautious.search wrote: ↑20 Sep 2024, 23:20It wasn't even so much about degredation, by the look of it. As far as I could see, the Racing Bulls were running most downforce of all teams, which can work out fine in quali with 4xDRS, but in the longrun they were losing massive ground on every straight. Imo too much to stay ahead, even on a track like this.