Kemal of Motorsport.com says it'll soon become clear who is suspected & who has been complaining
I think you mean roll stiffness, not lateral. Including this design would allow a very pliable front in Q, excellent over kerbs and also through high speed corners. It would also result in very few sparks in Q, because the skid block at the front of the plank isn't hitting the track.Quantum wrote: ↑17 Oct 2024, 13:55And to get away with that you would need huge amount of front-end lateral stiffness. How would you do it with a pliable ride when you would get uneven plank wear depending on the track direction? Clockwise you'll be wearing the left side and vice versa.
Tell tale signs of this would be huge understeer and particularly poor over kerbs.
Who has been complaining most about that?
Quite right...Vanja #66 wrote: ↑17 Oct 2024, 14:44I think you mean roll stiffness, not lateral. Including this design would allow a very pliable front in Q, excellent over kerbs and also through high speed corners. It would also result in very few sparks in Q, because the skid block at the front of the plank isn't hitting the track.Quantum wrote: ↑17 Oct 2024, 13:55And to get away with that you would need huge amount of front-end lateral stiffness. How would you do it with a pliable ride when you would get uneven plank wear depending on the track direction? Clockwise you'll be wearing the left side and vice versa.
Tell tale signs of this would be huge understeer and particularly poor over kerbs.
Who has been complaining most about that?
My understanding of the situation is that they found 1 team having this device in the car.