I see that differently, Mercedes used very little wing here, in qualy they could manage on the soft tires but it was super hard to do, and especially Hamilton through sector 1 was really great to watch. Car so loose but the low drag did enable a quick lap.214270 wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:50HAM didn’t do much running because of his off in practice, it’s just bad all round IMO if they have to rely on RUS for setup.RacePaceDemon wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:45Mercedes no where on race pace again. It's been 2 years and 7 months since these new cars first raced and they still don't understand them or the tyres.
this is the same wing they ran with in Singapore (Stella said it again talking to Kravitz post-sprint) where Lando looked the most dominant. mini DRS was never a thing on higher downforce wings, it cannot work with step flap angle at all. We've never seen any evidences the trick was there. bendy reary wing upper flap, the so-called mini-DRS was used only in Spa, Monza and Baku. Wait until Sunday to see what real Mclaren pace is.pantherxxx wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:41Mclaren without mini DRS is not that impressive on race pace. Without mini drs they would have probably lost in Baku as well.
Even if they had changed it and it did effect the high angle rear wings. I doubt it would have anything to do with the balance issues. The whole mini drs thing was only really of use in straights. The mini DRS gap closed in covers and thats where McLarens issues seemed to be so far.avantman wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:23this is the same wing they ran with in Singapore (Stella said it again talking to Kravitz post-sprint) where Lando looked the most dominant. mini DRS was never a thing on higher downforce wings, it cannot work with step flap angle at all. We've never seen any evidences the trick was there. bendy reary wing upper flap, the so-called mini-DRS was used only in Spa, Monza and Baku. Wait until Sunday to see what real Mclaren pace is.pantherxxx wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:41Mclaren without mini DRS is not that impressive on race pace. Without mini drs they would have probably lost in Baku as well.
Well apparently they have been told to change it, including the one used here:Watto wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:31Even if they had changed it and it did effect the high angle rear wings. I doubt it would have anything to do with the balance issues. The whole mini drs thing was only really of use in straights. The mini DRS gap closed in covers and thats where McLarens issues seemed to be so far.avantman wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:23this is the same wing they ran with in Singapore (Stella said it again talking to Kravitz post-sprint) where Lando looked the most dominant. mini DRS was never a thing on higher downforce wings, it cannot work with step flap angle at all. We've never seen any evidences the trick was there. bendy reary wing upper flap, the so-called mini-DRS was used only in Spa, Monza and Baku. Wait until Sunday to see what real Mclaren pace is.pantherxxx wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 20:41Mclaren without mini DRS is not that impressive on race pace. Without mini drs they would have probably lost in Baku as well.
Just goes into the same conspiracy pile to me as RBR secret miami changes. That there seems so little substance to.
stewie325 wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 07:50McLaren changing all their rear wings to stop flexing, and all of a sudden stop dominating. Surprise, surprise?
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/mclar ... /10664055/The squad has denied this but has conceded that as part of ongoing dialogue, it has agreed to make changes to its entire range of wings, including the one that will be used in Austin.
It is understood that this involves modifications to the upper element to stop it from flexing, as well as a narrowing of the slot gap.
it has nothing to do with the balance indeed. the mini drs trick was real and gained them few kph extra of top speed and free lap time, particularly in race trim (when not using the DRS). but again that only worked with the gently sloping flap on that special low downforce wing.Watto wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:31Even if they had changed it and it did effect the high angle rear wings. I doubt it would have anything to do with the balance issues. The whole mini drs thing was only really of use in straights. The mini DRS gap closed in covers and thats where McLarens issues seemed to be so far.
Just goes into the same conspiracy pile to me as RBR secret miami changes. That there seems so little substance to.
[/quote]TimW wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 22:36https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/mclar ... /10664055/The squad has denied this but has conceded that as part of ongoing dialogue, it has agreed to make changes to its entire range of wings, including the one that will be used in Austin.
It is understood that this involves modifications to the upper element to stop it from flexing, as well as a narrowing of the slot gap.