Emag wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 21:08
Ben1980 wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 21:05
Emag wrote: ↑19 Oct 2024, 21:01
The only reason they would have had to change all rear wings would be because all of them, including high DF packages, were flexing the same way as low DF wings, just probably to a lesser extent. People are just clinging into things that have no impact on the issues today.
It may have had no issue, but if the cars are designed for certain rear wings and these are changed, even a bit, will surely have an impact somewhere.
Would love to know how changing a rear wing so that it is aerodynamically and physically the same, with the only exception being that it no longer flexes at high-speed to open a gap that increased straight line speed slightly with DRS closed, can make a car stiff, increase tire wear and (probably) mess up tire temps.
Likey to maintain top speed with flap closed (important here for defence of position) the rear would now encompass less load/drag if that is primary setup target.
That reduction has to be matched by front flap reduction too, else it becomes too nervous in oversteer risk.
Ultimately proves the gain available from rear, when flex was observed, was real inspite of team protestations
they all say that when forced to make a change though.
Here it seemed to push them into "at the limit" uncertainty for the driver in dragging one lap,pace from it.
It'll be interesting to see if they fundamentally alter that balance now, trading peak speed, to approach qualli with more emphasis on total load. Perhaps with a different aim in tire life for race stints. Maybe that tradeoff will bring more ease to that end of stint tire life.