Lawson could partially impress showing off his skills against Perez, however, Marko also underlined that something was indeed missing. "But we know Lawson is a very tough racer. He's very difficult to overtake. But it shouldn't be within, not teammates, but with sister teams. There should be more respect," he concluded about the incident.
What in the world are you defending there mate? T8 was ridiculous!Vanja #66 wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:15Late brake and understeer, was fully ahead of Norris. Lando should have left him room and switch back easily, Max would have looked like a total amateur in that caseEmag wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:08That was actually the worse one of the two. Did you see the onboards? He just blasted into the inside and pushed Lando off while going halfway across the country himself too.Vanja #66 wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:05Max pushes ver the limit in T4, but T8 penalty was total BS. Total joke, to quote one particularly brilliant brain from Mercedes
Okish damage limitation with P6, I had him at P5 before the weekend and losing 15p to Norris tbh. If he wasn't so hot with Norris, would have been -6p, so just 4p more lost is not that bad
Well, what else should he say? Of course you should not hit the car, you want to sit in next year.
Yes, we need to come back to clean racing. Everyone behind each other, maybe a clean DRS pass. Not this fighting all the time...every race someone "outbraking" someone...disgusting.
I do not know, why anyone speaks about contracts, they do not matter! The contract is just a matter of money, they can say every day, "here is your new seat" and point to the armchair next to the car. There is no obligation in any contract to sit in the car.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 05:40Remember a few races back, there was the thing about Perez's current contract having clauses about minimum points ? What happened to that ? I guess Perez is just in it to the end now. Its rather embarrassing. Ferrari are already ahead in constructors points. There's no way in hell he's coming back next year. That whole 2 year contract was one of the most embarrassing gaffs in Red Bull history.
We can have clean and hard racing at the same time.
Could the penalties for cfd hours be manifesting itself now?AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 02:02I also think 2025 is going to have issues. 2025 is not a time for fundamental architectural changes. Like we saw from 2020 to 2021, it's only a matter of limited evolution because you need to spend more time on the 2026 cars.Paa wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 01:35I agree all of these. I even anticipated something like this for the end of the season around summer time.
What is even more worrying that Red Bull don't give any vibes suggesting that they know what is going on and will be able to come back strong for next season. And then the questionable engine comes into picture for 2026.
At this point there is no sign of positive turnaround at the horizont.
Mclaren and Ferrari are the favorites for 2025. They have a great base car to continue developing. They will evolve their cars like RB18-> RB19. Red Bull's original RB18 concept has been obsoleted. They benefitted from having a car which could be developed to its ceiling the quickest. Mclaren and Ferrari have adapted fundamentally different approaches to generating performance and it took them longer, but their ceiling is higher than that of the original Red Bull concept. They don't rely on infinite stiffness and high speed corners to win a GP. It's a huge effort for Red Bull to change course and they can't afford to do all of that while staying on top of 2026 development.
It might be not just a poor excuse. Perez ran much higher downforce package, he ran their biggest rear wing and the flaps on his front wing were clearly much steeper. But if you compare his and Max overlays from qualifying laps in Q1, they were dead equal on the straights, both in terms of acceleration and top speed. I know of course open DRS in qualifying mitigates some of the difference, but it absolutely cannot explain how two very different drag level produce same performance on the straights. and of course if there wasn't any difference on the straights, there is simply no way that Max would've opted for low downforce.
Seems more like they simply have lost direction without Newey. Even if Newey wasn't penning all the designs nowadays, he was still important for his ability to recognize issues and providing a successful development course for solving them. He was also very good at providing direction in terms of setup and how the cars needed to be ran on a given weekend. Both these things Red Bull have struggled with since he left and I cant see that's just some crazy coincidence.
This is the case without a shadow of a doubt. That's also what Red bull were predicting to happen this year themselves. Already in the final part of the last year, they weren't the fastest on two-three circuits. They were not as dominant as Max made them look. What we see now is only natural. Their current deficit to the fastest Mclaren though is ridiculously, unexpectedly massive, largely due to their vast superiority in "bendy technologies", partly due to Red bull own struggles with the upgrades.
Have you got a quote of him? I'd like to know what he said. ThanksAR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 02:50Marko changed a lot over the past year. Before he would downplay everything. Now he pushes copium and excuses to make it seem like Red Bull are not as bad as it seems. The one problem is that this only works on people who don't watch the races. I'm laughing at the suggestion that the PU is the issue here. The Honda doesn't have the degradation that Marko speaks of. That was something Honda is very proud of. If you add this phantom 5kph, Verstappen would have reached 353 km/h top speed in qualy. That's 3 km/h clear of any other car. Not realistic.
That is like believing in a Star Trek future.
This is not the reality in F1 for many years now. The last real wheel to wheel battle may have been Vettel vs. Webber with Multi21...Seanspeed wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 13:15Simply barging people off-track is not good racing, and is in fact depriving us of better, more exciting action. When drivers are allowed to go side by side through a corner, they can often carry that battle into the next series of corners, which makes for some of the best racing action possible.
...There should never be a reason in one on one battling for any car to be able to push another off-track, period.
No. There is constant change since 2014 and every year you could see why any crowding at the outside is not good, but they still try to write rules about it. I think the divebombing thing mainly started with Dan...Max was the king on moving.
Yes, but it is what it is. Wheel to wheel is an unrealistic thought, if you look at DTM, which had the best wheel to wheel in the last years, it barely goes without touching.