You cited the potential of a VSC and a safety car. It didn't happen. Belatedly adding "overheating engine" and "wasting tyres" as reason, should then be a metric used for all teams when bandying around "circus" critiques. So Merc wouldn't be any different from the other circus acts at McLaren, Ferrari etc.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:55I'm not ignoring what happened. What happened is the point. Russell had a damaged front wing and lacked pace. Hamilton was wasting his tires and overheating his engine and brakes to fight him for multiple laps. This was unnecessary. Let the healthy car go.Quantum wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:41A circus that finished 4th and 5th?AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Oct 2024, 00:37
You simply don't know how the race could have evolved. There could have been a VSC. There could have been a safetycar (and now they are going to have to do a tight double stack).
If Russell didn't have a damaged front wing, by all means let them race, but as it was, it looks more like a circus at Mercedes than a serious operation.
Where you expecting a podium?
Why ignore what happened and impose hypotheticals that didn't happen to ridicule the team? Very odd.
Even a damaged front wing Merc had enough race pace to manage a 10 second gap to Red Bull, Merc just didn't have the pace of McLaren or Ferrari and no amount of saving tyres and cooling engines changes that.