Yeah Leclerc is great. But by and large in F1, that isn't how it works and he was racing against a guy who'd lost his powers before then, it just wasn't quite so obvious until as when Leclerc joined. In the vast majority, experience is required to get the car to do what you want it to do, some can transcend that. Leclerc, Hamilton, Nando and Max are the only ones in about 20 years. The sums up about how hard it is to be that guy,. that comes in at the front and does the business from day 1. it is telling that he was only a little better than Sainz overall at Ferrari, and I don't put him in the same class as Lando.Ben1980 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2024, 16:24Because others have been, as I said Leclerc walked into Ferrari season 2 and rolled over Vettel a 4 time world champion, hell Lewis walked in an gave Alonso a going over. Do we want to look at Oscar as similar levels of potential, we need to consider him against others.mwillems wrote: ↑06 Nov 2024, 15:55Because you can't just come in and drive a Formula 1 car at this level and win a WDC. Of course it takes a hell of a lot of ability and also experience, as well as certain mental resilience.Ben1980 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2024, 15:47
But, I don't see why they shouldn't have the same expectations. Your teammate is who you can really be based against. Oscar got the job, on the basis he would perform, and he has had to perform.
If Oscar was pulling a Perez, the case against him would be damning, and he would be going into last chance saloon already.
He Doesn't get a pass for being new, and he doesn't need one. Charles Leclerc 2nd season was pole position in his second race, 7 poles and 2 wins. You have to step up.
( I think Leclerc is better than both Mclaren drivers though)
Oscar does have to perform, and his team mate is his base. But I can't see any reason in your sentence, or in my head, why a driver is expected to be about as quick as a WDC contender after 1 season and 5 further races. I actually think that's quite a silly thing to say.
No way that after 1.5 seasons, Oscar should be expected to be legitimately as effective as a guy who's raced for 5.5 seasons or for anyone to think all the perks of being with the team and racing for F1 for all that time is of no benefit.
You've got high expectations, but I fear, only in the direction of one driver
Lando season 2 he finished 8 points behind his more experienced team mate. I'm sure with ups and downs. So, in reality he performed as he should. This isn't an Oscar Vs Lando thing. It's about a young driver doing what is expected of them.
But, I also think Oscar has performed as he should, and times even better.
In any case, this all seems like an attempt to measure Lando and Oscar by different sticks, one in which Oscar is expected to come in and do more than what Lando was able to do when he started with mclaren and today, and whilst it is perfectly explainable that Lando hasn't pushed on and done more, it is right to expect Oscar to be the match of Lando.
When you put it down in words, it looks very silly, because it is.
Oscar looks to be a Sainz like driver because he's only about matching Lando's performance, whereas Lando is a WDC contender.
Hmmm.... doesn't quite add up. It almost feels like there is an outcome people would like to get to.