McLaren 1-2 there is what everyone expects I thinkf1316 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:15I think the constructors is now very unlikely, unfortunately. They will need to leave Qatar having scored more points than McLaren - and, in principle, a decent amount more - and without exogenous events, I just don’t see that happening. It’s a shame because I think it will be very close in the end but just not quite enough.
McLaren 1-2 is what most people predicted for today’s race and we all knew where they finished.deadhead wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:46Too much drama for my liking.
I guess Sainz knows that his might be his list chance of a podium or a win so he is just trying to maximize that, which is understable, but at least say it out loud and just do that instead of saying one thing to the team and doing something else on track.
McLaren 1-2 there is what everyone expects I thinkf1316 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:15I think the constructors is now very unlikely, unfortunately. They will need to leave Qatar having scored more points than McLaren - and, in principle, a decent amount more - and without exogenous events, I just don’t see that happening. It’s a shame because I think it will be very close in the end but just not quite enough.
Carlos is never a team player, for him it me, me, and me again hence all the top team didn’t want himcodetower wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 16:14This is why nobody wanted Carlos.SoulPancake13 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 10:50The team(or may aptly Sainz I guess) have lost Charles it seems. He is fuming. Sainz just spoke of an agreement they have to not speak of each other in the media or on the radio so this might get spicy. These vibes are not what we need to win WCC...
Can't say I blame Charles. Seems like every-time they have an agreement about in race behavior, Sainz ignores.
What??Timtim99 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:51McLaren 1-2 is what most people predicted for today’s race and we all knew where they finished.deadhead wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:46Too much drama for my liking.
I guess Sainz knows that his might be his list chance of a podium or a win so he is just trying to maximize that, which is understable, but at least say it out loud and just do that instead of saying one thing to the team and doing something else on track.
McLaren 1-2 there is what everyone expects I thinkf1316 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 19:15I think the constructors is now very unlikely, unfortunately. They will need to leave Qatar having scored more points than McLaren - and, in principle, a decent amount more - and without exogenous events, I just don’t see that happening. It’s a shame because I think it will be very close in the end but just not quite enough.
https://x.com/F1BigData/status/1860762370274161071
Good to read the entire thread, that way you can see when the author corrects their own misinformation.More information on this, taken from
@victorabadf1
, it seems that Sainz's behaviour in turns 10-11 is NORMAL, even the engineer asked him on the radio on several occasions to lift his foot more in that area.
This is the translation of his post.
The fact is this: Sainz lifted his foot between turns 10-11 for 82% of the race.
Not only did he do it throughout the Grand Prix, but the track engineer insisted for half the race that he do it even more. Since the data is of interest, here is the detail of each time he lifted his foot + the radios of his engineer:
Passing your team mate when you had been told not to race him, and he had been told to bring his tyres in slowly because you wouldn't be challenging him is not 'fair and square'.
If Sainz was only following team orders then the team should have told him to push until Verstappen was out of DRS range, though I'm sure that would have been another of the instructions he would choose to ignore.
Maybe he beat him fair and square, but the way he did it was dirty. Not to mention the fact he had several tenths worth of extra pace due to the fresh engine he got after screwing up quali in Brazil. I recall Vanja saying it was worth about 3 tenths a lap in Las Vegas.Cs98 wrote: ↑24 Nov 2024, 16:30Not sure what point is being made. Sainz beat Leclerc fair and square despite that massive blunder at the second stop. If Leclerc was much faster he would've caught him on fresher tyres at the end. Anyways, I just think people are quick to jump on Sainz and make up conspiracies without even bothering to look up the facts. Some of this stuff can literally be debunked in 5 seconds.
In his defense it would have saved relatively little… everyone pitted the lap after anyway on tires that should have lasted 14+ laps and instead were done after much less than that, and it was apparently not a gradual drop in performance.Xyz22 wrote:Leclerc completely mismanaged the first stint. Why was he so aggressive ? The only logical explanation was that he wanted to have free air but clearly they didn't expect to have so much graining. The pace with the hards was good enough to finish P2 probably.
Race execution has been really terrible.
He really wasn't that aggressive at all. He did a minimal amount of pushing and it just seemed to destroy everything.
FYI Leclerc also thinks he mismanaged the first stint. (I don't know if I agree, I think it was only bad in hindsight. Nobody predicted the mediums would be that bad. Norris also really struggled on the mediums.)Xyz22 wrote: ↑25 Nov 2024, 01:51Leclerc completely mismanaged the first stint. Why was he so aggressive ? The only logical explanation was that he wanted to have free air but clearly they didn't expect to have so much graining. The pace with the hards was good enough to finish P2 probably.
Race execution has been really terrible from the pit wall as well. Sainz lost 2s with that late pit stop call and Leclerc pit way too late for the third stint. He lost a lot of time as well.