Emag wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 11:58
mwillems wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 11:41
Emag wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025, 11:31
Vettel wasn't gone by that point, he was literally in a title fight a year before. However, his career was ended early by Leclerc. He started as the #1 driver at Ferrari in 2019 and as the season progressed he had nothing on Charles. It was even worse when the car was bad the following year.
And please, let's stay objective. Carlos did really well last year, but saying Leclerc is not much different than him is factually wrong. Especially when you look at the entire period they were teammates. Carlos has never been on the same tier with Charles.
It is not me who expects too much. If you consider someone to be a future WDC then beating or at least matching your teammate is the bare minimum. First year is always excused, but his gap to Lando did not budge on the second too.
I typed poorly, I meant not much difference in points in Leclerc vs Sainz and Leclerc vs Vettel.
No doubt he has to match Lando. But you have to consider the quality of his team mate when deciding
when. Making arbitrary deadlines doesn't really work. A 6 Year veteran of the Mclaren car and it's traits vs 2 year rookie after a year out and saying by year two be as good as the other potential WDC champion in year 6? That's not objective at all.
He's shown he can exists at that level and deal with the pressure at the front. Better than others in my opinion, If consistency and the average performance continue to rise then I'm very happy.
In any case, Max was 50 points of DR in his second season vs Oscars 70, so applying the same logic and looking at the result explains why your point doesn't stand too well when looked at by others, Appreciate your opinion but hope you understand why I can't see it holding water.
The whole McLaren trait thing has been overblown because Ricciardo did so poorly. If a driver is good, he is good no matter the car. Sure, some cars might suit better, but you don't drive like Ricciardo was driving just because the car is not to your liking. The guy just fell off.
As for Oscar, he is a tough racer for sure and definitely an improvement over Ricciardo, but I am not convinced he is the "future wdc" people seem to call him. Let's see how he does this season. I expect him to be whitewashed by Lando again, but who knows, I might get surprised.
Also, Max is not in a comparable situation. He joined RedBull on the 5th race of the season in 2016. But even if you discount that, the guy was 18. Mental aspect aside, he literally had room to grow physically as well. You can't compare a child's potential for improvement over a grown adult.
Even in season 3 Max wasn't matching Dan, and got 83% of his points vs Oscar getting 78% of Landos points (vs 43% in 2023). And Max is one of the best drivers to ever grace any motorsport so yeah I think it's fair to say 2 seasons is optimistic, in my opinion.
There are general traits as well as the well discussed traits. Lando was 2 years into a ground effect formula with specific driving requirements when Oscar started, none of the other formulas drive like this, it demanded something new from every driver and he's learning it all on top of everything else.
I expect Lando to finish ahead on points again this year, but I don't expect it to be by much. I don't care if he is generally one position behind Lando in Q, especially if the timing margins were as fine as they were last year. Sunday is they day that counts.
I suppose if I were to set a benchmark then I'd want Oscar to gain at least 90% of Lando's points total this year to set a decent benchmark and continue his progress. If you want to say this guy is ready for a WDC fight then he'll match Lando this year. Obviously that is subject to any silly or lopsided results like one driver being taken out multiple times through no real fault of their own (Max?). But I think he'll be somewhere between.
Time will tell.