I don't think it's that either tunnel is wrong, but the way our engineers were using the tunnels. We've already seen an article explaining that Newey was teaching them how to best use the tunnel etc. Alonso mentioned at the start of the season about how they found out a better way to use the tunnel too.vas_04614 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 08:00If AMR and Merc WT numbers of AMR25 doesn't match they need to
- find which WT is wrong
- If it's AMR WT, then fix it and and re run AMR 25 current car and upgrades planned to make sure numbers match. Also restart 2026 car from scratch w.r.t WT testing
- If it's Merc WT, then scrap upgrades already planned and find issues again using AMR WT and design new upgrade. For 2026 car, they should be fine with the work done till now I guess
- Personally they should take time and may be plan only 1 upgrade for 25 car like for spain.
one doubt, if both tunnels are fine then shouldn't they get same numbers for AMR25 in AMR WT by following same processes/methods they used in Merc WT? if tunnels are different and it's not possible to use same processes/methods in both tunnels, then the only source of truth is actual car, so basically build an upgrade using new AMR WT and validate WT numbers with on track numbersAlo_Fan wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 10:08I don't think it's that either tunnel is wrong, but the way our engineers were using the tunnels. We've already seen an article explaining that Newey was teaching them how to best use the tunnel etc. Alonso mentioned at the start of the season about how they found out a better way to use the tunnel too.vas_04614 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 08:00If AMR and Merc WT numbers of AMR25 doesn't match they need to
- find which WT is wrong
- If it's AMR WT, then fix it and and re run AMR 25 current car and upgrades planned to make sure numbers match. Also restart 2026 car from scratch w.r.t WT testing
- If it's Merc WT, then scrap upgrades already planned and find issues again using AMR WT and design new upgrade. For 2026 car, they should be fine with the work done till now I guess
- Personally they should take time and may be plan only 1 upgrade for 25 car like for spain.
The AMR wind tunnel is definitely an upgrade, and should offer higher efficiency one would imagine. However, it's difficult to see the Merc wind tunnel isn't okay as Mercedes are doing fine with it, albeit they had some correlation issues with upgrades last season too.vas_04614 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 10:27one doubt, if both tunnels are fine then shouldn't they get same numbers for AMR25 in AMR WT by following same processes/methods they used in Merc WT? if tunnels are different and it's not possible to use same processes/methods in both tunnels, then the only source of truth is actual car, so basically build an upgrade using new AMR WT and validate WT numbers with on track numbersAlo_Fan wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 10:08I don't think it's that either tunnel is wrong, but the way our engineers were using the tunnels. We've already seen an article explaining that Newey was teaching them how to best use the tunnel etc. Alonso mentioned at the start of the season about how they found out a better way to use the tunnel too.vas_04614 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 08:00If AMR and Merc WT numbers of AMR25 doesn't match they need to
- find which WT is wrong
- If it's AMR WT, then fix it and and re run AMR 25 current car and upgrades planned to make sure numbers match. Also restart 2026 car from scratch w.r.t WT testing
- If it's Merc WT, then scrap upgrades already planned and find issues again using AMR WT and design new upgrade. For 2026 car, they should be fine with the work done till now I guess
- Personally they should take time and may be plan only 1 upgrade for 25 car like for spain.
Having an in house wind tunnel is not only about being better (i.e. providing more accurate results) but also about logistics.Alo_Fan wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 12:12The AMR wind tunnel is definitely an upgrade, and should offer higher efficiency one would imagine. However, it's difficult to see the Merc wind tunnel isn't okay as Mercedes are doing fine with it, albeit they had some correlation issues with upgrades last season too.vas_04614 wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 10:27one doubt, if both tunnels are fine then shouldn't they get same numbers for AMR25 in AMR WT by following same processes/methods they used in Merc WT? if tunnels are different and it's not possible to use same processes/methods in both tunnels, then the only source of truth is actual car, so basically build an upgrade using new AMR WT and validate WT numbers with on track numbersAlo_Fan wrote: ↑21 Apr 2025, 10:08
I don't think it's that either tunnel is wrong, but the way our engineers were using the tunnels. We've already seen an article explaining that Newey was teaching them how to best use the tunnel etc. Alonso mentioned at the start of the season about how they found out a better way to use the tunnel too.
This is not the first time he has said this, perhaps a hint that nothing major will come out of the factory during this season? or trying to put some pressure on the team
i mean, its sorta just common sense. even if we bring good upgrades, everyone else will bring upgrades too, and the likelihood that theyll be scoring easy points is a bridge too far unless the top teams start crashing into each other. on normal weekends only 3 points are available anyway. lets hope for more australias haha