Another dedicated thread where I disagree? Ok maybe not. But I do disagree. I hope we won't see Flabio eber again.xpensive wrote:What more do we need?
WhiteBlue wrote:In any case the "kangaroo court" nonsense should be dismissed by a regular court and another f1 myths will be eradicated.
I have no problem at all to admit that my expectation was not met the because the grand tribunal did not even examine the facts. So the object of my prediction wasn't on the agenda.xpensive wrote:I'd say WB, do you have any concept of just admitting to have made the wrong prediction...
FIA wrote:The court has rejected the claims... by Mr. Briatore and Mr. Symonds ... for an annulment of the FIA's decision.
... did not examine the facts and has not reversed the FIA's finding that both Briatore and Symonds conspired to cause an intentional crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
.....did question the FIA's authority to impose bans upon Mr. Briatore and Mr. Symonds .... because they are not FIA licence holders.
BBZZZZ wrong - Mark and his partner Ann Neal manage his affairs nowxpensive wrote:Kovalainen and Webber still do.Agerasia wrote:...Even though he won who in their right mind would employ him.
So that means Stefan F1 have no chance seeing Mike Coughlan has been hired as chief designer??ISLAMATRON wrote:didnt they word Mike Coughlin's ban to say hat no team employing him will be given a FIA license?
Pitpass wrote:In February this year, the FIA lifted restrictions imposed on Coughlan which had involved the governing body recommending that licence holders should be wary of working with him.
So the answer is no I guess.WhiteBlue wrote:I have no problem at all to admit that my expectation was not met the because the grand tribunal did not even examine the facts. So the object of my prediction wasn't on the agenda.xpensive wrote:I'd say WB, do you have any concept of just admitting to have made the wrong prediction...