I thing the wing is OK.
If you do not see the gap from the front, why it should be illegal?
As usual Ferrari cannot get it to work then.meves wrote:Does anyone know hat the tops speeds were in the last test? top speed
And let the arguments begin, it appears that Ferrari has raised the legality of the rear wing with the FIA but he other teams aren't as worried.
http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_ ... t_id=40053
Ignore me I'm 2 pages late on the argument bit but I'm still interested in the top speeds!
http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_ ... t_id=40054autogyro wrote:As usual Ferrari cannot get it to work then.
Keep talking Montezemelo.
Top speeds at Barcelona: Hamilton: 313 kph, Massa + Barrichello: 308 kph, Schumacher + Kubica + Sutil: 307 kph, Buemi: 305 kph, Di Grassi: 302 kph, Vettel: 301 kph, Kobayashi: 300 kph, Kovalainen: 298 kph.astracrazy wrote:yeah i would like to know the top speeds
Shweet...the Williams-Cossie has grunt and aero efficiency in a straight line Always a good thing to havePedro wrote:Top speeds at Barcelona: Hamilton: 313 kph, Massa + Barrichello: 308 kph, Schumacher + Kubica + Sutil: 307 kph, Buemi: 305 kph, Di Grassi: 302 kph, Vettel: 301 kph, Kobayashi: 300 kph, Kovalainen: 298 kph.astracrazy wrote:yeah i would like to know the top speeds
Perhaps some legalese is going on.timbo wrote:http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_ ... t_id=40054autogyro wrote:As usual Ferrari cannot get it to work then.
Keep talking Montezemelo.
Hahahahaha, they would wouldnt they.impaero wrote:Ferrari have denied knowledge of any protest against McLaren's wing. (Autosport)
Low aspect ratio?SLC wrote:It isn't.ringo wrote:Another consideration is that F1 wings have gurneys on their trailing edge, low aspect raito and end plates this does have an effect vortex formation and i think the slot is addressing the Vortex street and wake behind the car.