Oh yeah. Just noticed the W-wing was missing.mith wrote:I think it's photoshopped R29.raymondu999 wrote:First marussia. Now Lada. And is it just me or does that R30 in the photo have a tighter ass than the real one in the testing
Oh yeah. Just noticed the W-wing was missing.mith wrote:I think it's photoshopped R29.raymondu999 wrote:First marussia. Now Lada. And is it just me or does that R30 in the photo have a tighter ass than the real one in the testing
It may be. But what for did they modeled whole car if they could add Lada logo on presentation photos almost effortlessly?Blackout wrote:That's not a photoshop nor an R29. That's a poorly 3D modeled R30.
You mean the pictures that was released during the new livery presentation? I thought that was also photoshopped R29... Never mind... Still I don't think that photo above is revealing anything interesting either being pure 3D model or photoshopped older car.Blackout wrote:This 3D R30 is not new. We saw it even before new car's presentation.
Are asymmetrical camber settings on a single axle ever used? Not that it applies to this specific case with the R30 but I'm just wondering, although I think every case I've ever known about has symmetric settings left to right.Jersey Tom wrote:Looks like LF could stand to have some more camber. Maybe my eyes deceive me.Blackout wrote:Maybe, maybe not.
Possibly at Indy due to the banking, but I'd imagine it would only be a slight difference.mx_tifosi wrote:Are asymmetrical camber settings on a single axle ever used? Not that it applies to this specific case with the R30 but I'm just wondering, although I think every case I've ever known about has symmetric settings left to right.Jersey Tom wrote:Looks like LF could stand to have some more camber. Maybe my eyes deceive me.Blackout wrote:Maybe, maybe not.
Well you want the best lap time, but you also want even tyre wear and a consistant balance through-out a stint - for the race anyway.marcush. wrote:I do not see a reason why you should have a symmetric setup.This is definitely not set in stone.
You will chosse the setup that is giving the best lap time and if it ends up having
no symmetry at all why not?
You may start development with a symmetrical approach ,just to not confuse yourself and the driver though as assymetries are really hard to understand for the driver
Exactly !Diesel wrote:Well you want the best lap time, but you also want even tyre wear and a consistant balance through-out a stint - for the race anyway.marcush. wrote:I do not see a reason why you should have a symmetric setup.This is definitely not set in stone.
You will chosse the setup that is giving the best lap time and if it ends up having
no symmetry at all why not?
You may start development with a symmetrical approach ,just to not confuse yourself and the driver though as assymetries are really hard to understand for the driver