That's quite a subjective obvervation, as we don't know the set-ups, fuel loads, etc. And it is known that Nico had set-up problems on Friday.ringo wrote:Shumacher is sharpening up. He can now challenge Rosberg.
Can see the intensity he has on the track in practice 3, let's see how qualifying goes.
My friend, this is bullshit. Wet races are the classic opportunities for drivers of inferior cars to shine. Schumacher Spain 1996 being a classic example!mx_tifosi wrote:The performance in rain mainly goes down the car not just the driver. An example is Massa; he did horribly in the rain at Silverstone in 2008, slipping and sliding all over the place, but battled amazingly with Kubica wheel to wheel in a rain soaked '07 Japanese GP.
If your car goes well in the wet then great, if not then you're sh*t out of luck.
A mid/lower pack car can be better in the wet than a top car. Many variables are in play, so no BS on my part. Neither of us are incorrect about it.WhiteBlue wrote:My friend, this is bullshit. Wet races are the classic opportunities for drivers of inferior cars to shine. Schumacher Spain 1996 being a classic example!