Don't forget the F-duct. 6-10Km/h extra top speed is what was often mentioned for Mclaren.timbo wrote:Well, Ferrari set fastest speed today, just a little shy of 312.autogyro wrote:Are you sure the increase in speed is not more to do with the engine changes made?
In Shanghai, it was in the pack, with speeds equal to Mercedes and RedBull. Both were around 303-304 today.
So, if we consider that Power ratio = (speed ratio)^2 (since drag is squared with speed), and we assume they had 750 Hp before the upgrade, the figure we achieve (well, if I've done my math right, of course) is ~785-790 Hp. Quite a big upgrade .
Math is one of my many weak points, but I think most of us would agree that a 35-40 hp jump is quite unlikely, especially with the rev limit in place. (Now, there was talk that Ferrari previously was unable to use the full 18K rpm. IF the changes have allowed them to increase revs substantially, then the figures make a little more sense. But if they have found 35-40 hp, then Marmorini deserves a big raise.) I think it's a case of a bit more power + the effect of the F duct.timbo wrote:Well, Ferrari set fastest speed today, just a little shy of 312.autogyro wrote:Are you sure the increase in speed is not more to do with the engine changes made?
In Shanghai, it was in the pack, with speeds equal to Mercedes and RedBull. Both were around 303-304 today.
So, if we consider that Power ratio = (speed ratio)^2 (since drag is squared with speed), and we assume they had 750 Hp before the upgrade, the figure we achieve (well, if I've done my math right, of course) is ~785-790 Hp. Quite a big upgrade .
That's what I meant. The gain is too much to come from engine under current regs.hollus wrote:Don't forget the F-duct. 6-10Km/h extra top speed is what was often mentioned for Mclaren.timbo wrote:Well, Ferrari set fastest speed today, just a little shy of 312.autogyro wrote:Are you sure the increase in speed is not more to do with the engine changes made?
In Shanghai, it was in the pack, with speeds equal to Mercedes and RedBull. Both were around 303-304 today.
So, if we consider that Power ratio = (speed ratio)^2 (since drag is squared with speed), and we assume they had 750 Hp before the upgrade, the figure we achieve (well, if I've done my math right, of course) is ~785-790 Hp. Quite a big upgrade .
I fully support Timbo here. I think Ferrari made the same mistake that McLaren did in Bahrain and Australia, not giving the car more downforce.timbo wrote: That's what I meant. The gain is too much to come from engine under current regs.
I think F-duct is pretty efficient, but they should've chosen a much higher downforce setup.
That was the general view, certainly in the first race at Bahrain, but I don't buy it. I don't think it is possible to simply be more aggressive with downforce with this system because the rear wing functions in a completely different way than with other cars.timbo wrote:I think they are struggling with finding correct aero setting with F-duct, just like McLaren @ Bahrain. They probably could be more aggressive with downforce and let F-duct recover the speed lost on the straight.
Guys, I've got a question: The driver must cover the hole with the back of his left hand to activate the system, right? Does it not affect his driving?
Yep we should...Thats the F10 thread though.SchumacherM wrote:Sauber has the same system of activating. Shall we bash them too?