PNSD wrote:Its all well and good using anohter teams car, but when you dont understand the concepts of which it is based upon you will not reach its potential.
For a new team, it is better to start from scratch, learn and understand together and develop from that.
Take STR for example... Only in 2007 (with Vettel) were they good enough to compete against RBR, otherwise they are waaaay behind. Too much too account for just being the engine.
I highly doubt you´d not learn a lot more say as HRT from a car like a Toyota then from a Dallara...they no nothing of it ,save that it is crap and would not do anything the same now they got hold of it...
so to buy a car in itself is not the ultimate way ,right but if you do so it is better to buy a works car than something one has tried to make money .
As for Lotus ....they have so many ex Toyota employees i would be surprised there is not a lot of knowledge in there already about this car...so not valid to say they don´t understand the car.
For USGP it was better than what they did chose to do .the money is down the drain
anyways.
For Virgin ..don´t underestimate the bonus of having a current top notch car available as a base of reference.It is like you could walk into Renault or Williams and see EVERYTHING.They do actually know a lot about racecardesign and construction ,but obviously not quite enough.That would have been the chance to take a lot of shortcuts -without painful mishaps.
to make your experience on your own is the most time consuming way to tackle thingss...as we can see in Virgin.
of course if there was a major bug in the toyota it would not be easy to find it ...but then ask Mercedes they have designed their own car and still they cannot pinpoint their problem or better rectify it.