The losses are not bigger than the multiple mechanical to electrical conversions.autogyro wrote:Dont forget to factor in the losses from the actuation system of the variator.
I think you will find that a much lighter induction flywheel generator motor would be a better idea.WhiteBlue wrote:The losses are not bigger than the multiple mechanical to electrical conversions.autogyro wrote:Dont forget to factor in the losses from the actuation system of the variator.
A flywheel cannot generate 70 hp from exhaust gas.autogyro wrote:I think you will find that a much lighter induction flywheel generator motor would be a better idea.WhiteBlue wrote:The losses are not bigger than the multiple mechanical to electrical conversions.autogyro wrote:Dont forget to factor in the losses from the actuation system of the variator.
Yes but an induction charged motor generator on the turbine shaft does not need any complex gearing or inverter, just an epicyclic reducer and maybe not even that.ACRO wrote:i think the electrical hybrid charging rises first in big industrial engines since here you have a relative steady load of the engine ( e.g running a generator ) and so a steady turbo rpm. further in such big applications the turbo is very big and runs at relative low rpms. a small car turbo reaches rpms in exess of 200000 and there seem to be no generator/inverter systems that can deal such rpms without gearing. at wikipedia i found here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_turbocharger
one company developing a small hybrid charger , but it currently seem to be only on a drawboard, the practical function is not fully confirmed.
it maybe a future for hybrid cars since you can recover electrical energy far beyond using just braking energy, very interesting.
Not for the direct power figures you require.WhiteBlue wrote:Why would that need energy? Can't they use springs or hydraulic pressure without flow?