ell66 wrote:raymondu999 wrote:ell66 wrote:Jenson Button: It was an extremely long and tough race, but I was pleased with my overall performance. I think I got the maximum from the car, and while it would have been nicer to have finished ahead of Mark, Sunday's points still definitely keep me in touch
is he kidding? lewis did him by nearly half a second in qually, and pulled away from him easily during the race.
I allways thogh lewis was fast before this season, but iv been very disapointed in jensons speed all year. maximum out of the car? yeak ok jens you keep saying that
Lewis did him by .373. That's not even 75% of half a second.
Sorry for being pedantic here, but this is a sport where in Hockenheim we saw pole being taken by 0.002, and Jerez 1997 (I think?) where we saw 3 people setting identical times to the nearest thousandth. And you just slowed down Jenson by .127
Funny that the momentum seems to come in pairs. Button won 2 of the early flyaways, Then Lewis struck in the middle with Turkey/Canada back to back, Alonso now has 2 races in a row, and Webber clearly had momentum back in Turkey/Monaco.
[wishful thinking]Statistics-wise, the law of averages would indicate that Seb is next
[/end wishful thinking]
3/4 tenths us a very big difference at this level, you should know this. Im merley calling out jensons bullshit comment of getting all the performance out of the car when he clearly hasnt.
Button got slaughtered.
This "his race pace is better than his qualy pace"
myth is busted. Drivers have 1 true pace, the gap in qualifying is the real gap in the race if both drivers are putting in the same effort.
Heiki's and Truli's problem is that they usually set up the car to work in a narrow window for qualifying. The car is not as compliant in the race and they find it difficult to drive and have to lower their pace to reduce risk.
But clearly if the car is consistent in qualy and race a drivers pace will be the same.
Button has always been between 2 and 5 tenths slower depending on the track. However he is fair in saying that he got the maximum from the car.
The way how Hamilton and kobayshi drive is not sustainable, the car is meant to be driven comfortably with the least amount of risk. This is why redbull and ferrari made things look very easy on the track, as we've seen from Webber mentioning how Kobayashi was jumping curbs and skimming walls.
No driver can get 100%, but i think there is a percentage at which it is driven with the right balance of safety, surefootedness and speed.
Lets say this percentage is 85% of total performance. Button could be driving at this point; tail not sliding around, wheels not on the locking limit, no counter steering against turn apices. This way you can guarantee you wont lose the car.
Hamilton on the other hand is probably driving it at 95%. The car is less stable and on the borderline of losing control. We saw how Kobayashi hit the barriers, and How hard Glock was pushing in the virgin.
So yes Button got his ass whooped, but he at least shows how much slower the mclaren really is.
This reminds me of the MIG-25 fox bat.
The MiG-25's speed gauge was redlined at Mach 2.8, and pilots were instructed not to top Mach 2.5 in order to preserve the engines. Achieving the MiG-25's maximum potential speed of Mach 3.2 would result in the destruction of the engines.
Hamilton is flying the Mig...
uhh Mp4 25 at mach 3, button is rightfully cruising at mach 2.8