Lightspeedrt wrote:Sorry maybe i didn't make myself clear that is irrelevant. What i was trying to say is, maybe basing some of your features on the one second breakers would be a good idea.
flynfrog wrote:the area where you CO2 chamber meets your body could use some work maybe simplifying the co2 chamber a little. also remember you want a sharp break away on the trailing edge of things. The car is looking much better than when you started. You really need a way to test these either on the computer or in real life. Otherwise we are just taking shots in the dark.
Lightspeedrt brings up a good point look to other fast cars for inspiration. But you need to understand why they did something.
can you elaborate on the "sharp break away on the trailing edge of things"flynfrog wrote:the area where you CO2 chamber meets your body could use some work maybe simplifying the co2 chamber a little. also remember you want a sharp break away on the trailing edge of things. The car is looking much better than when you started. You really need a way to test these either on the computer or in real life. Otherwise we are just taking shots in the dark.
Lightspeedrt brings up a good point look to other fast cars for inspiration. But you need to understand why they did something.
ill try applying it to every front edge of my car but only with the place where separation occurs.flynfrog wrote:look at an airfoil and notice how the trailing edge is sharp not rounded this is to allow the air to make a clean separation instead of a turbulent attachment to the part.
Izzy410 wrote:IF you didnt change the parameters it would be 18m/s head on wind. and that's all. ground effect is entered automatically for an F1 simulation. but no wheel rotation tho. that has to be introduced manually. and i dont think you've introduced turbulent air flow from the CO2 catridge because that would has to be inserted manually
