I would have been better to state that the gains they might be getting or think they will be getting would have to be larger than any small changes to weight distribution.volarchico wrote:You're not the first person to mention that "weight is a non issue", but I can't believe that's entirely the case. It's all about weight distribution, for sure. From what I've read, teams still try very hard to reduce weight so that then they get to CHOOSE where to ballast instead of being stuck with it.Giblet wrote:Secondly weight is a non issue, any weight gained from the exhaust is just removed from ballast.
Thanks for the picture , but still it's not enough , gimme sight on a Engine i would like to see how the exhaust is connected with engine directly.
+2. I don't care how much ' the long dev period' they have had. Something as extreme as that is quite an unrealistic proposal in my eyes.n smikle wrote:BS!
You can obviously see the molding for exhaust under the rear wishbones. You can even see the heat resistant material out back. There is only kevlar/carbon fibre mix at the front. Kevlar is flame resistant, but the continuous temprature rating is not that high ~ 400C. Not to mention by running two phat 3 inch pipes under the car, you'll be baking every god damn thing under the driver.
The molds are there guys, just think for you selves. The skirt at the where is where the exhaust comes out. Last year an emphasis was placed on evening out the energy distribution of the hot gases from the exhaust. Putting the exhaust at the front will only serve to destroy that with huge amount of turbulence seen as the air makes it's way to the back.
If I'm wrong. I will change my avatar to a picture of HRT driver Sakon Yamamto for two weeks.
Agerasia wrote:Some of the comments on here amaze me.
Comments regarding too much back pressure if the exhaust was pointed forward are just plain false. Engines become very efficient when back pressure is introduced into the exhaust system, afterall that's exactly how systems like Yamaha's EXUP work. They virtually close the exhuast off at low revs.
I expect to see a lot more development over the course of the year in regards to those vanes forward of the rear well. It's an exploitable area with a lot of potential.
Lastly I strongly suspect that the exhaust is blown out the bottom of the sidepods at the point where it starts to narrow.
It would involve some interesting piping if that was the case. The rules state only two exists for exhaust gas can exist. There must be some sort of loop hole if Renault is indeed blowing the gasses under the side pods. I thought there could only be one hole in the diffuser for the starter.Giblet wrote:Maybe not ALL the exhaust is routed up front (if any), maybe it is split.