How is it meant to behave?richard_leeds wrote:That explains the injuries to his right side when he was sitting on the left side of the car.
However, Armco isn't supposed to behave like that which raises a few questions....
I would agree that the armco damage looks bizzare. Especially the section that is literaly in the engine bay! It is intended to disperse the energy from the crash. It is meant to flex a certain amount but not that much!Callum wrote:How is it meant to behave?richard_leeds wrote:That explains the injuries to his right side when he was sitting on the left side of the car.
However, Armco isn't supposed to behave like that which raises a few questions....
- Are you remembering that it is 'normal' Armco and not from a racing track?
richard_leeds wrote:However, Armco isn't supposed to behave like that which raises a few questions....
It is not unusual that cars get pierced by guardrail. I think it was just bad luck. But luckily he survived ! Go KUB!countersteer wrote:richard_leeds wrote:However, Armco isn't supposed to behave like that which raises a few questions....
I agree... The support post visible to the left of the photo doesn't look very substantial. I would also expect to see another within the frame.
FrukostScones wrote:
It is not unusual that cars get pierced by guardrail. I think it was just bad luck. But luckily he survived ! Go KUB!
Oh my... How unlucky can you get... Get well soon is all i can say.Chubbs wrote:This is the picture: -Callum wrote:Sorry for all the links but i'm not sure how to link just a picture.
About 3/5 down the page is a picture of the car in the railings.
http://forums.autosport.com/index.php?s ... 19&st=1160
Oh my... How unlucky can you get... Get well soon is all i can say.