Around the front wing? That's totally new. Do you have a link to this video?segedunum wrote:you could see the exhaust gas and where it was going in previous testing videos. They were blowing it outwards around the front wing and tyres.
Around the front wing? That's totally new. Do you have a link to this video?segedunum wrote:you could see the exhaust gas and where it was going in previous testing videos. They were blowing it outwards around the front wing and tyres.
Smells like BS, source please.segedunum wrote:They were blowing it outwards around the front wing and tyres.
segedunum wrote:You only need to see the car in testing - as I'd said. The exhaust plume clearly wasn't going underneath the car.
What is it with peoples' inability to read around here?
Around the front wing??? I hope that's a typo, because a jet of hot gas reaching the front wing from the side pods would be a reverse thruster.segedunum wrote:They were blowing it outwards around the front wing and tyres.
Yeah, I know...hence my post stating the obvious. But I guess you didn't realize I was stating the obvious.Raptor22 wrote:well SLC, Raptor and a fewothers have been telling you this for weeks now.
The position of the exhaust cannot at any point be below the 50mm step plane so the floor has an edge that is angled up to meet the exhaust outlet.
Oh, sorry.Raptor22 wrote:my post was directed at the person who posted the picture.
It's an innovative feature blowing through the middle of the front wing, splitting the airflow left and right onto the front wing and over the front tires for improved aero! *sarcasm off*richard_leeds wrote:Around the front wing??? I hope that's a typo, because a jet of hot gas reaching the front wing from the side pods would be a reverse thruster.segedunum wrote:They were blowing it outwards around the front wing and tyres.
We can read all right mate.segedunum wrote:You only need to see the car in testing - as I'd said. The exhaust plume clearly wasn't going underneath the car.
What is it with peoples' inability to read around here?
I might be wrong, and another thing I never thought I'd do, but sticking up for seg, he did put a wink. I'm pretty sure he was just messing with us.segedunum wrote:You only need to see the car in testing - as I'd said. The exhaust plume clearly wasn't going underneath the car.
What is it with peoples' inability to read around here?
segedunum wrote:I never said it did 'blow on the front wing' , but it was clearly blowing in the arena behind the front wing, tyre and more importantly in front of the floor when you watched the car in from a standing start in testing, which seems pretty sensible given what they look as if they're trying to achieve - accelerating air and getting more volume under the car.
From the exhaust thread we never did establish what blowing hot air under the car would do other than increasing dynamic pressure and creating lift. Clearly not desirable. I simply can't see what it would achieve.
@Raptor22:Raptor22 wrote:segedunum wrote:You only need to see the car in testing - as I'd said. The exhaust plume clearly wasn't going underneath the car.
What is it with peoples' inability to read around here?
So you prefer to believe that hot expanding gas will flow around corners ather than expand within the constraint set up between the floor, the road and the vortex flowing along the side generated by the great big vortex generator at the edge of the floor.... This I have to see but its your choice to believe what you want. I'm not goin to force the issue with you. btw exhaust plume???!
its not a rocket engine there is no exhaust plume. Exhaust gas from reciprocating engines revert to atmospheric pressure very rapidly and disperse within the fluid medium uniformly, hence it makes far more sense to expand it between boundaries.
I await the next chapter in your arguement