Team: John Owen (CD), Loic Bigois (HA), Craig Wilson (Head of Vehicle Eng. & Dynamics), Russell Cooley (CE), Ross Brawn (TP), Nick Fry (CEO), Norbert Haug (VP), Thomas Fuhr (MD), Rob Thomas (COO) Drivers: Michael Schumacher (7), Nico Rosberg (8)
A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
If the car is quick, whats the point in a 3 element front wing?
Yes it would have been good to see, but I dont think having somthing "good to see" is going to make you faster.
Im certain they added a 3 element front wing to full scale models in the wind tunnel, and havent changed because it isnt beneficial.
Its the shortest car on the grid, maybe this wing works well with their design concept. I mean these are the guys with the numbers in front of them at the end of the day right?
Im more interested to see wether it flexes like Red Bulls, because this is where real time can be had in spades.
Guys why the fixation on a 3 element wing?
You do realise that each car is designed to a different philosophy and that in ulktimeate performance terms both a 2 or 3 element wing can achieve similar overall results.
Diesel wrote:This must be how Red Bull pass the deflection test, the wing flexes when pushed from the front, the test is done by pushing from above...
Ok so you;re suggesting the wing in fact pendulums about the pylins and the angle of attack increases.... possible.
that would contravene the rule that the central portion of the wing cannot produce downforce,it has to be neutral. they would not be able to get away with the arguement that it is impossible to build a flex free structure
Looks like a new Front wing to me. Did they put Schumacher on the old wing when they sent it out for his fastest lap? But have to agree AMS would know better
Last edited by kris on 11 Mar 2011, 13:30, edited 1 time in total.