It's in the 2011 car comparison thread. Same subforum as this thread.Reventon wrote:anyone got a link to the giant duplicate picture Giblet edited out ?
I've been looking for it for about an hour !
It's in the 2011 car comparison thread. Same subforum as this thread.Reventon wrote:anyone got a link to the giant duplicate picture Giblet edited out ?
I've been looking for it for about an hour !
The rules are alot tighter on crash structures this year, McLaren's choice will be down to packaging and obviously passing the crash test.n smikle wrote:You guys notice that the crash structure doubles as an extra "mini" beam wing?
That is why I have been so vocal about mclaren's stubbornness to lift the god damn thing off the crash structure.
Indeed, it's a very shallow front wing as well. Perhaps designed to pivot like the Red Bull wing, giving a greater angle of attack when it's running at speed?Owen.C93 wrote:1 think about the Ferrari front wing that surprises me is how short it is and far from the front wheels.
Ferrari wing: http://www.formula1.com/wi/1140x600/pla ... 9ma133.jpg
Torro Ross wing: http://www.formula1.com/wi/1140x600/pla ... 9ma186.jpg
Ballast is often placed in the centre of the wing.shelly wrote:What do you think the hatch on the center of ferrari front wing is for? (small circle with 6 fixings)
Yeah, still, look at the Ferrari's. They have two downforce producing surfaces in the place where macca has one.Diesel wrote:The rules are alot tighter on crash structures this year, McLaren's choice will be down to packaging and obviously passing the crash test.n smikle wrote:You guys notice that the crash structure doubles as an extra "mini" beam wing?
That is why I have been so vocal about mclaren's stubbornness to lift the god damn thing off the crash structure.
The crash structure itself probably doesn't produce much downforce, it'll be the area they open up under the beam wing.n smikle wrote:Yeah, still, look at the Ferrari's. They have two downforce producing surfaces in the place where macca has one.Diesel wrote:The rules are alot tighter on crash structures this year, McLaren's choice will be down to packaging and obviously passing the crash test.n smikle wrote:You guys notice that the crash structure doubles as an extra "mini" beam wing?
That is why I have been so vocal about mclaren's stubbornness to lift the god damn thing off the crash structure.