I'll be very surprised if the car can be made much better unless they have some major changes and updates (which seems to be a slogan of the team now).
Hope they do better in the race

JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Lindz wrote:Everyone relax, it's only Malaysia. We have to wait until Monza until we see the true pace of the W02, then you can start saying it's a mistake.
Right, JET, et al?
Tell you what Lindz, you do better? Im bitterly dissapointed with this car, and in fact with the overall state of Mercedes GP. Marcush and Xpensive have already mentioned the lack of detailing on this car, and previously the W01. The team needs a shakeup, that is evident. But I think its happening as we speak, Bob Bell will have knives and daggers out at the factory for anything unsatisfactory. They have the best engine and KERS and still Schumacher is outdone by a Sauber.
The car seems now to be a mish mash of reality and fantasy, things arent doing what they should...heard that before.
If he doesnt, the Mercedes really are up ***t creek without the preverbial paddle. This is my main concern. The car hasnt demonstrated its speed at a track that was supposedly suited to its core strengths.
Now we get the usual acronymic BS with KERS and DRS. The more tech the more the teams got an excuse. As a silberpfeile fan, this is pathetic. Neubauer would be turning in his grave at the sight of these guys.
Paint the cars black tommorow and call it a "concept by Mercedes-Benz", because every mile these cars do in silver is a disgrace to the heritage of the 3 pointed star. W02? Thats a joke in my view. More like BGP003 with fancy paint work.
2012 and Mercedes simulators and tech cannot come soon enough for these guys.
And if I were Brawn I would also look at getting James Key over, look at what Sauber are doing with there resources......
Im livid, but I wont draw out the heavy weaponry until I see Mercedes actuall influence on the team.
+1marcush. wrote:If you struggle to produce a moving flap how can you master a real complex system?
marcush. wrote:design flaws, lack of expertise ,dedication and passion .Lack of applying the rules for sucess.If you struggle to produce a moving flap how can you master a real complex system? Is it wise to let a young guy on an internship design such a device wich is a performance differentiator? Maybe it is just a lack of guidance and application .Exp was talking about company culture.A Boss maybe invisile but suddenly is approaching you and asking very uncomfortable questions or you might not ever see him and your work is not really guided by senior personel when help or advise is needed...looks like a ship without a proper captain to me at least one with eyes and ears that have seen much better days ...maybe worn out by things nothing to do with the job in hand.
Race mechanics usually are really,really good .I bet it ´s not the spanner man who is the root cause but a issue in the chain .
It´s like Sauber getting kiked out because of a simple legality issue .It´s impossible.You need to constantly check your proceedures.And if you don´t have the man power it´s even more important to assign and distribute the jobs to be done.No excuses.
That's what I presumed too ... when you hear drivers talking about the wing not working, it's nothing to do with an actuator or a solenoid, but probably more about the airflow not re-attaching quickly enough when the flap shuts, so you go sailing into the braking zone with a stalled rear wing.Dragonfly wrote:Could it be aerodynamics related?