I was referring to pit stops due to tyre wear.andartop wrote:Maybe I'm too thick or it's just too early in the morning, but I always thought there was only one way to count pit stops, ie the traditional way of counting, same as with all things?archiebald wrote: Depending on how you count them there were 73~82 pit stops in this grand prix.
I think you need to edit that again - third time lucky maybe?. Where did I mention the quality of ANY of the cars or their race pace?Echo wrote:I think McLaren failed to have the same pace as the Bulls and Alonso? It wasn't Pirelli's and DRS fault that McLaren didn't have a good car. I feel tha McLaren isn't as good as you think. Same with Ferrariarchiebald wrote:I've posted elsewhere on this.
The race was bad for two reasons IMO.
1. DRS zone was too long making it too easy to pass. I agree with DRS in principle - it worked brilliantly in China with only about half the overtaking attempts actually panning out. But in Turkey, the overtake was guaranteed for the overtaker and the overtakee had virtually zero possibility for any defensive driving.
2. Pirelli need to make real tyres. There is very little driving skill involved in overtaking someone who's tyres are dead after 10~15 laps. Depending on how you count them there were 73~82 pit stops in this grand prix, the most since Donington 1993 and that was under changeable wet/dry conditions.
The best racing in the event was Lewis vs Jenson (mostly outside the DRS zone) and on similar aged tyres.
Bridgestone + KERS + Good DRS setup is all we need. Pirelli = fail
As for the Massa vs Lewis pit release, that was in no way the same as Lewis vs Vettel from China 2010.
China 2010 - both cars released together, Lewis got wheelspin and lost ground, Vettel deliberately tried to push him into the garages.
Turkey 2011 - Lewis was almost level with the Ferrari pit when Massa was released, Lewis reacted when he thought Massa was going to hit him, but otherwise ran straight.
Massa staying alongside Lewis was not the point, initial release by the team was the problem IMO.
Edit: wrote at the wrong place
Edit: spelling
Yes - thank you, that is precisely what I meant.raymondu999 wrote:Huh? In now way does Archie put in excuses for McLaren. McLaren clearly underperformed in Turkey; and I don't think anyone can refute that. Sure it was due to several mistakes; but that's all part and parcel of formula one. A large part of it is also making sure you don't make mistakes.
I used to be a McL fan myself (though not really nowadays) and I can't refute that the battle that lasted 5 or 6 corners between the McLarens were exciting stuff.
He's not blaming Pirellis for McLaren's goofs in Turkey; he's blaming Pirelli for making a fresh-tyred car to be able to too easily overtake a worn-tyred car; and blaming the long DRS zone for making overtaking too easy.
This is from the RB7 thread, my reply probably belongs in here.raymondu999 wrote:At the risk of further baiting off-topic discussion; if Vettel can drive within himself, then still qualify regularly 5-8 tenths ahead of Mark Webber; then that seems rather alarming
Well he jumped in the pool after the race so..alelanza wrote:And then be #0 in Monaco? i guess that means go into the ocean or similar, which considering Webber's track record is not unthinkable
I'll eat my 1:18 FW18 replica if that happens. Trends and history are no guarantee of the future. Vettel is in a different operating zone to Webber right now.HampusA wrote:Expecting him to win the next race then considering the above and the fact that he took pole and won last year at Spain,
And was 0.9 seconds faster then the closest rival not considering Vettel.