andrew wrote:I though McLaren were the only ones towards a wet set up JET? Got a source to confirm they were on a wet set up?
Darn excuses again.
I think it is safe to say that the W02 is great in the wet but dreadful in the dry.
Hah hah, the tam always reminded me of dave chappel as a crack head.andrew wrote:Seriously Ringo, what you been drinking? We all know that it is only moderators who are allowed to drink and post at the same time.
True that...Also in fact i believe had it been dry we could have seen a Ferrari win.horse wrote:Longest GP in history apparently (if you believe Jake Humphrey). If it was dry it would have been the shortest!
Those things you cannot learn from. That is apart of your character. I suggest you look up the sprinter Asafa Powell.multisync wrote:Vettal admitted he made a mistake and locked up. It's likely that was because he was bing pushed very hard by Button. He also noted his mistake for not pushing harder earlier to give sufficient cushion. Does that make him a bad driver? No Is that likely to make him become a bad driver ? No way
He will learn that lesson (as will RB)and make sure it doesn't happen again and not take a win for granted.
I hope that don't take the win away from JB as he did drive superbly. I don't see sufficient in either incident to justify a dsq but then again nor did I agree with some of the DR's which were being handed out rather too freely for me..
Poleman wrote:True that...Also in fact i believe had it been dry we could have seen a Ferrari win.horse wrote:Longest GP in history apparently (if you believe Jake Humphrey). If it was dry it would have been the shortest!
same thoughts here... button man of the race no doubt but I feel sorry for Michael being a sitting duck in the endless DRS zone here, podium would have been well deserved after all of the critics on his return.Poleman wrote:I feel sorry for Michael i would love to see him in the podium...Well deserved it.