The whole point in having this stuff on the first post is so that people can flick back to it quickly and find this information. It's no good if the proper map ends up on page 2,3 or 4 and we end up having to hunt for it each time. Stop being so rigid and actually listen to the people that use these threads eh?andrew wrote:Whole page is relevant only if it shows something worth while. Why say 1000 words when 500 will do? I like the race threads I have opened to have some sort of standardisation, nothing wrong with that. Plus it depends what is available at the time. The FIA site is sometimes slow to produce the circuit info so I gave up on them a while ago and found a reasonable alternative.Diesel wrote:Whole page is relative, not everyone runs the same screen resolution as you.
However, there is nothing stopping others from posting an alternative circuit graphic later in the thread once it is available, in fact this usually happens and no one makes an issue of it.
Ps- I said 'relative' not 'relavant'HampusA wrote:Could you please next time get a nicer track layout? it´s Silverstone and they have built a new complex so we could celebrate it like that in a way
I'll see what I can find. Might see if I can find some good pics of the pit complex with its funky roof (do you know who the architect was - it's bound to be on their website). Will that fulfill the artistic requirements along with the scaled pen sketch I'm doing for Forumla None? I'm gonna be busy, I'm terrible at freehand sketches so the sketch of the track will take a while.
For the record, words of an unnamed mod:
Whiteblue used to do a better job but for some reason Andrew just decided to take that away from him without even asking or acknowledging that WB had been doing it for over a year.