I don't see the hydrocoptic marzul vanes, are you sure? To me, it looks more like a drawn reciprocation dingle arm.Formula None wrote:No, those are wain-shafts, which prevent side fumbling.
You are wrong, refer to tech article 3.18.1 (its dot point 5). The physical point of rotation of the upper element can be no more than 20mm below or 20mm forward of its rearmost extremity.TheWiseOwl wrote:The trailing edge has to be the pivot point, hence it doesn't move in relation to the rest of the wing when DRS is activated.Holm86 wrote:Is it possible that when the DRS is activated this mechanism not just raises the leading edge but also lowers the trailing edge??
Yes, which basically says, "You have enough room to get the pivot point though the centre of the wing rather than stuck right on it's edge". All teams will have this pushed to the limit already.MIKEY_! wrote:You are wrong, refer to tech article 3.18.1 (its dot point 5). The physical point of rotation of the upper element can be no more than 20mm below or 20mm forward of its rearmost extremity.
Well no, because dead smack back on the trailing edge would be a physical impossibility – you would need an infinitely thin pivot. "Within the last 20mm of the wing in both dimensions" is effectively "on the trailing edge" but taking into account that you can't make infinitely thin, but strong bits of car.MIKEY_! wrote:Yes my point = it doesn't have to be the trailing edge therefore Holm is correct. And of course they have pushed this as far as it will go.
Is it an ambaphascient lunar wain-shaft?beelsebob wrote:I don't see the hydrocoptic marzul vanes, are you sure? To me, it looks more like a drawn reciprocation dingle arm.Formula None wrote:No, those are wain-shafts, which prevent side fumbling.