dren wrote: I'm curious to see how much more performance the W02 gains from the new exhaust.
That is a posibility. I don't know how much of the underside of the Renault they will have to change to better work with a rear blown diffuser. It'll be interesting, because Renault seems to think they will reap some good gains.n smikle wrote:Could it be argued that the front exiting exhaust is much more difficult to master than the blown diffuser, and so it would be a cakewalk if Reanualt switched to EBD?
just putting it out there.
Not an unreasonable assumption to make. Renault took a risk with their approach and I think it was always a long-shot considering that their exhausts were further away from the diffuser and where the grip is generated at the rear tyres without skirts to aid it.n smikle wrote:Could it be argued that the front exiting exhaust is much more difficult to master than the blown diffuser, and so it would be a cakewalk if Reanualt switched to EBD? just putting it out there.
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Good thing percieved attention to detail of arm chair experts, is not the big differentiator being made out in some quarters here.
Renault could have all the attention to detail in the world, it's still not as quick as the w02.
People bemoan mercedes due to them not switching exhausts sooner... Well I didnt see renault change at silverstone... Where the stinging criticism there?
Facts remain after renaults false dawn start to the season, with podiums and points, they cannot live with a shortwheel based "including finished" rehashed Honda with merc v8 and a bloke who's apparently masquerading as an engineer.
There is some severe hyperbole going on here and I think the mods need to bring a big brush and clean this thread, including this post.
I agree completely, Renault shoot themselves in the foot with the strange xhaust layout, funny thing is that Mercedes, according to JET anyway, were ready to copy it without much further analysis, what does that tell you about their design team?munudeges wrote:Not an unreasonable assumption to make. Renault took a risk with their approach and I think it was always a long-shot considering that their exhausts were further away from the diffuser and where the grip is generated at the rear tyres without skirts to aid it.n smikle wrote:Could it be argued that the front exiting exhaust is much more difficult to master than the blown diffuser, and so it would be a cakewalk if Reanualt switched to EBD? just putting it out there.
I do agree that Renault's attention to details and engineering is, all things considered, just better than Mercedes. I shudder to think what the Volvo exhaust people would have come up with at Merc if they had decided to front exit their exhausts.
Actually, 4th fastest (at best) IS poor when you remember this is Mercedes we are talking about. They are (their marketing says) a world leader in automotive technology; they take great pride (they say) in their engineering excellence. They have two key players from the dream team. They surely have or have access to the resources needed to compete at the front of the grid. Yet they are -- at best -- the poorest performing of the major teams.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:ringo wrote: Poor work planning and practices in the work place compared to the likes of mclaren.
You know this how?
4th fastest and they are poor? Thats more than harsh....
The car is indeed terrible and apart from that glimpse of hope in China, which even I fell for, their season is beginning to look futile. While I'm sure that the Daimler board will stick to their committment of three seasons, but that's surely it, afterwhich McLaren will return to "getting the best engines" position.donskar wrote: ...
Their car is a failure -- not every mechanical device, even from the best technical teams is a winner. I only question how long M-B will allow themselves to be disgraced on the world stage.
donskar wrote:Actually, 4th fastest (at best) IS poor when you remember this is Mercedes we are talking about. They are (their marketing says) a world leader in automotive technology; they take great pride (they say) in their engineering excellence. They have two key players from the dream team. They surely have or have access to the resources needed to compete at the front of the grid. Yet they are -- at best -- the poorest performing of the major teams.JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:ringo wrote: Poor work planning and practices in the work place compared to the likes of mclaren.
You know this how?
4th fastest and they are poor? Thats more than harsh....
Their car is a failure -- not every mechanical device, even from the best technical teams is a winner. I only question how long M-B will allow themselves to be disgraced on the world stage.