crickey -these Brawn statements are hopefully just political.
IF their problem was the high fuel tank and the Cof G height with high fuel loads this is potentially a reason for their tyre consumption with high fuel loads but it is NOT a reason why they cannot challenge for pole as on low fuel loads =qualy and last stint the difference in CofG height is simply not there.
hopefully they adopt the RB positioning of KERS components after the summerbrake and erase that cofG disadvantage they are speaking of all the time ...they could even use this battery repositioning to elongate the wheelbase....two flies with one stone...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52284/5228451c7fe646b73dab788f5f8ec9b900d31954" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
a neat carbonspacer cum batterycase wi´th a hole for the driveshaft in the middle also containing the MGU.Not a 4 weeks design and engineering task but they know for a long time now where they failed.
Again Mercedes is looking at the wrong areas and seems unable to question every decision and solution they have on their cars.
What does a amateurish workmanship and design in areas of development show? Maybe the guys working on it not identifying themselves with what they do? As a works team they should be able to beat at least Mclarens B-Team Force India ...