To tell the truth i'm not sure what i am seeing right now.
It's very interesting that they are so small.
Whether it's the cutouts working with the pointy tip on the end of the end plate is another thought for consideration.
They have had those vortices since the car rolled out in winter testing, photo from Jerez in February:ringo wrote:Am i the only one seeing the vortices on the wings here?
...
No mention of them at all?
Whilst true, this is the first time we've seen them with the new rear wing. Previously it had been suggested that it was the long chord upper plane in the rear wing that was helping them generate the vortices.feynman wrote:They have had those vortices since the car rolled out in winter testing, photo from Jerez in February:ringo wrote:Am i the only one seeing the vortices on the wings here?
...
No mention of them at all?
You normally don't see them looking like that due to the far-away and straight ahead TV angle they use when the cars are on the straights generating the vortices, they look like circles, but that is what they actually look like, long and spun-out.
The McLaren has been by far the most vorticey car from the beginning.
Ah, but the question is; did he do the thing with the rear wing?myurr wrote:Hamilton, at least, didn't use that mini wing above the beam wing.
This should be in the race thread instead mateBanki wrote:Bravo! =D> =D>
Here's a thought. They could DRS through Turns 7 and 8 in quali earlier on; with a quick direction change in the middle. Would 130 not be easier than that to DRS through?beelsebob wrote:I'm not convinced by "must have been able to do it" – if their DRS dumps more DF than anyone else's it's entirely conceivable that they couldn't.raymondu999 wrote:Yes I saw that too. But others on the options could do it (Sauber/Lotus) so they must have been able to do it; or maybe just not confident enough to do it