I'm sure he will cry himself to sleep with all of his trophies and his world championship from this year.ringo wrote:Sure you boy can handle a full wet race?
Vettel must have lost his nice bubble after that puncture.
I'm sure he will cry himself to sleep with all of his trophies and his world championship from this year.ringo wrote:Sure you boy can handle a full wet race?
Vettel must have lost his nice bubble after that puncture.
When it was really really wet in Hungary Hamilton crawled all over him, and then he made a mistake. When it was wet in canada, Button was regularly putting in faster laps than him, and when it was drying he ofc made his fatal mistake. Sorry, but I've not seen any evidence that Vettel is quick in the wet.mnmracer wrote:Vettel's always been extremely quick in the wet. The only thing that troubles him a little (or the Red Bell, Webber doesn't seem to do well either) is in drying conditions, but in Canada and Hungary, when it was raining, Vettel was flying.
The second part is undeniable; but Button was stronger than Vettel in the phase where the conditions were for intermediates; and slicks. On the first half with full wets Button wasn't faster than Vettel.beelsebob wrote:mnmracer wrote:When it was wet in canada, Button was regularly putting in faster laps than him, and when it was drying he ofc made his fatal mistake.
At Silverstone, 1) it was only half wet 2) Hamilton was the one that really moved in the wet phase of the race, he was behind people so not lapping fast, but he was regularly overtaking everyone around him.LionKing wrote:Vettel is usually the quickest guy during full wet periods in the races.
Korea last year, Silverstone and Canada this year...
Agree, I have not seen a proper rainmaster since Michael Schumacher. In fact, Schumacher was really mighty in Canada until the weather dried up. If they didn't stop the race, who knows... The old man impressed me continuously and I really hope he will continue to improve next year and onwards.Gerhard Berger wrote:What's worrying for Vettel is that he hasn't won a wet race since China 2009, though at times he certainly has shown excellent pace in the wet throughout his career.
At the moment, no one on the current grid stands out as a rain master the way Schumacher or Senna used to. Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel and Button have all had their good and bad moments in the wet and alot seems to depends on the way the car handles its tyres.
Agreedringo wrote:Button isn't good on intermediates.
He has went fast on a dry line on slicks. Vettel is better than Button in any wet or drying conditions.
What Button has is wisdom to go into the pits for the slick tyre at the right time.
Agreed, except I don't think Alonso is exceptional in the wet. He's kind of average in my mind; slightly under Hamilton/Vettel in terms of wet drivingWhen it comes to intermediate tyre running and wet running, Alonso and Hamilton are top class. Vettel in Korea 2010 was also top class.
I just checked one more time the lap times:beelsebob wrote:At Silverstone, 1) it was only half wet 2) Hamilton was the one that really moved in the wet phase of the race, he was behind people so not lapping fast, but he was regularly overtaking everyone around him.LionKing wrote:Vettel is usually the quickest guy during full wet periods in the races.
Korea last year, Silverstone and Canada this year...
At Canada Hamilton was lapping faster than Vettel when in clear air, Alonso was also right up with his times.
Yes he was – but as I said in my original post – Hamilton was held up behind people at Silverstone, he was however easily passing people on track.LionKing wrote:At Silverstone till the first pit stops, Vettel was faster than Hamilton all 11 laps except one lap (by 0.053 sec). He was 16 seconds in front at the end of lap 11.
Again – bottled up behind people – when Hamilton had clean air he was 0.7 faster, 0.03 slower, 1.8 fasterLaptimes at Canada before Hamilton retires at lap 7:
---------Vettel----------Hamilton Delta Gap
1. 2:18.174 [1] 2:22.459 [5] -4.285 -4.285
2. 2:06.919 [1] 2:06.157 [5] +0.762 -3.523
3. 2:05.303 [1] 2:05.340 [5] -0.037 -3.560
4. 2:05.715 [1] 2:03.927 [5] +1.788 -1.772
5. 1:36.175 [1] 1:40.949 [6] -4.774 -6.546
6. 1:34.827 [1] 1:39.917 [7] -5.090 -11.636
7. 1:35.452 [1] 1:37.761 [7] -2.309 -13.945