It is not me who is making up facts. You have come into the thread with 2 posts to your name and posted theories without any factual support!Bob S. wrote:Ok, now i sorta think you are making up "facts", have a strange story or you are VERY close with Hellmund. I say that b/c NONE of this is reported. It has no sources.WhiteBlue wrote:He cancelled the contract because Hellmund did not manage to get the first fee financed by Epstein. Apparently Epstein refused a small finance period of some weeks for the first $25m to bridge a gap between the pay out by METF and the due date by Ecclestone. We know that at the same time Hellmund and Epstein had differences about the right strategy for the business. The nature of the disagreement is unknown. We also know that the failure to pay that fee in time triggered the METF to withdraw their finance of the first race fee for one year. And we know that the contract duration which was initially 10 years is now shortened by some years. The rest is just some very imaginative interpretation from you. It has no resemblance with the known facts.
All the above facts can be found with the proper sources in this thread. In most cases the sources were posted by either me or Hairy Scotsman.
To document that I have pointed you to the particular post and source for the point in time when the wandering creek site was first visited by Tilke and inspected for its potential as a site for the Austin circuit.
I could do this with every fact that I have mentioned because I have a long memory. But I don't think it would be appropriate. Why should I prove to you that you obviously never read this thread which has all the information? Everybody familiar with the issue knows that YOU ARE WRONG. All of this has been reported and posted here.
And please take note that I'm not "very close to Hellmund". I do not even know the guy. My total knowledge is derived from public sources. But the study of those sources was very diligent. I would say that you would do well by applying 10% of that diligence to reading the sources. If you did that you would not come out with so much uninformed speculation.
Please don't quote me wrong!! I hate that. I have mentioned that Epstein's companies include "Wanderingc Investors LLC". There is only one letter missing but it makes all the difference. So much about accusing others with being "loose on the facts". Clean up your act!Bob S. wrote:Merely an fyi, but “Wandering Investors LLC” (what WB said) is different than "Wandering Creek Investments" (what you later said, after saying Wandering Investors LLC was noted in several articles). I mention it only because some are getting loose on the "facts" while doing their best to push a point of view.
