Exhaust?
Yes. Could be a clever move.Tumbarello wrote:I like the nose treatment. It's strong and purposeful and embraces the new regulations with a bold statement, rather than trying to soften it's effect.
Could it be creating turbulent air in a pocket of high pressure, that smoothes the airflow over the bump...?myurr wrote:More likely driver cooling. They don't have the hole in the end of the nose.Websta wrote:Could it possibly be an intake for an F-duct-like system?
This could affect the airflow around and over the cockpit as well.
I think you mean the 'splitter'. The keel is the part that the lower wishbone attaches to. Most modern F1 cars are 'zero keel' like this one.gibells wrote:Very strong keel.
Looks like same position as RB5Redragon wrote:Where are the exhauts?
Giblet wrote:I think you mean the 'splitter'. The keel is the part that the lower wishbone attaches to. Most modern F1 cars are 'zero keel' like this one.gibells wrote:Very strong keel.
They were able to run more rake because of the EBD. This is in the Newey questionaire above.myurr wrote:Is it me or is the car running less rake than in previous years?