IMO that's mostly to cut drag, than add DF, but hey, you can probably have both!ringo wrote:They wont get much from it though, but it's something.
IMO that's mostly to cut drag, than add DF, but hey, you can probably have both!ringo wrote:They wont get much from it though, but it's something.
Those exotic materials might be OK but the paint isn't!munudeges wrote:I thought Ferrari were using these much vaunted 'exotic' heat-proof materials? At least according to the Twitter feeds I read.
nice! where did you find those?? it creates a high pressure point at the step..wouldnt that create some downforce?Crucial_Xtreme wrote:F2012 step nose in Fluent. Just under 180mph
via MichaelPM
It was done by a guy on another forum. Looks like Tombaizs wasn't lying when he said they felt it provided the best aero.amouzouris wrote:nice! where did you find those?? it creates a high pressure point at the step..wouldnt that create some downforce?Crucial_Xtreme wrote:F2012 step nose in Fluent. Just under 180mph
via MichaelPM
is that a hole in the bottom of the crash structure, just below the wet weather light?Mr.G wrote:Just highlighted some probably testing stuff and temp. monitoring tapes.
EDIT: It looks like the difuser hase some slot on the whole range.
well isnt all kinds of downforce draggy??raymondu999 wrote:What's going on in the first pic? I see the high pressure zone on the 2nd one; but none in the first?
Also; wouldn't downforce generation based on simple impulse be draggy?
I meant draggier than what they produce with, say, the rear wing.amouzouris wrote:well isnt all kinds of downforce draggy??raymondu999 wrote:What's going on in the first pic? I see the high pressure zone on the 2nd one; but none in the first?
Also; wouldn't downforce generation based on simple impulse be draggy?