I believe Renault used the Hot blowing, where Red Bull didnt because of the temperatures generated were detrimental to their setupBoost wrote:I didn't think that the Renault engine used hot blowing.Lorenzo_Bandini wrote:http://forums.autosport.com/index.php?s ... &p=5515198
There are some intersting bits from the Renault engine guy Jean Caubet in the sportbild print issue.
He says the Mercedes engine has 15 hp more than Renault but their engine is more fuel efficient and the drivability is better.
Overall he says they have a small edge over Mercedes.
His rating puts the Ferrari engine as 3rd best, having about the same hp output as Renault but a higher consumption and worse drivability.
He added that Red Bull can start the race with 15-18(!) liter less fuel than the competitors.
Caubet also gives a hint that they found a clever solution with Red Bull to re-gain the performance loss of the hot blowing.
Do his consumption figures come from last year when the Merc used hot blowing? Not only was this used to drive the diffuser but also to compensate for the drag of the KERs unit when harvesting energy which would have had an effect on the fuel consumption.