3°, not 15.hardingfv32 wrote:Any experts on the Conda effect. I question whether it is applicable if the flow in not initiated at a tangential angle. What I am getting at is the body surface at the exhaust tip must be at an angle of 15 degrees per the rules. This is an angle, not a radius. All the examples of Conda effect systems I have found are at least 0 deg.
Could this McLaren channel just be an form of a 15 degree cone to control the expansion of the exhaust flow? Keep a narrow focus as long as possible?
Brian
sejamesxy wrote:hey guys
here is the full view of the car
<youtube>
It's just some news company's random 3D model, and not a very accurate one at that.sejamesxy wrote:hey guys
here is the full view of the car
<video>
Yeah. Sidepods looks nothing like the real model.beelsebob wrote:It's just some news company's random 3D model, and not a very accurate one at that.sejamesxy wrote:hey guys
here is the full view of the car
<video>
As many as you like, and can fit in.sejamesxy wrote:How many radiators are you allowed in f1 car.
Please expand on statement.beelsebob wrote:3°, not 15.