He is following the same path as last year.Hail22 wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/formul ... ds-newsxml
Bernie is too busy counting the money so he has decided to place the decision on the teams all of a sudden?
Nah. That's Bernie's way of softening the ground prior to an announcement that the race has been cancelled. The issue is already decided.Hail22 wrote:Bernie is too busy counting the money so he has decided to place the decision on the teams all of a sudden?
Bernie is really shrewd that way. Doesn't surprise me at all.richard_leeds wrote:That's standard, he'll be wanting to move the decision to most politically acceptable option.
Also, if he cancels then he'll forfeit the fee, if the circuit cancels they'll forfeit the contract. The only escape route is for the teams to cite safety reasons. Then everyone can express the will to participate, contracts stay in place, money doesn't need to be handed back.
"One of the teams sent a person over there recently - and I've spoken to them today actually - and they said everything's perfect, there's no problem," said Ecclestone. "They've been to the circuit, they've been everywhere in Bahrain and they are very happy."
Extremist groups are using "scare-mongering tactics" in a bid to exaggerate the unrest in Bahrain and force the cancellation of the country's Formula One race, the circuit chairman claimed Tuesday.
There have been growing calls for the April 22 Bahrain Grand Prix to be canceled for a second consecutive year because of daily clashes between security forces and anti-government protesters that have led to 50 deaths. A jailed activist on a two-month hunger strike has also galvanized rights groups leading the opposition to the race.
But circuit organizers have stepped up efforts to counter fears that the tiny Gulf island was too dangerous for racing.
What has been happening is that armchair observers β who have not been sufficiently interested or committed to investigate the situation for themselves β have been driving this debate, at the expense of those neutral parties who have taken the trouble to investigate the situation at first hand," Bahrain International Circuit chairman Zayed Al Zayani said in a statement. "This, combined with the scare-mongering tactics of certain small extremist groups on social networking sites, has created huge misconceptions about the current situation."
In a bid to highlight support from the teams to race in Bahrain, organizers released excerpts from a report they said was prepared by Lotus after visiting visited Bahrain.
"There is a need to keep the circuit and the teams secure and they (race organizers) are doing this and they feel very comfortable about the arrangements," the report by unnamed Lotus officials read. "If there is going to be protestation then it will be confined to peaceful protests β you will maybe see some banners being waved and maybe some tires on fire, but that is all they expect. We came away from Bahrain feeling a lot more confident that everything is in hand."
Earlier Tuesday, F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone said it was up to the teams to decide whether to travel to Bahrain and that he couldn't force their hand.
"We can't say, 'You've got to go' β although they would be in breach of their agreement with us if they didn't go β but it doesn't help," he said. "Commercially they have to go, but whether they decide to or not is up to them. I've had no one say anything other than, 'We're going to be racing in Bahrain.'"
But the Formula One Teams Association, which represents seven of the 12 outfits, said that a decision on canceling the race is up to the governing body.
"There's been some media speculation recently to the effect that the teams may seek to cancel this year's Bahrain Grand Prix," FOTA said in a statement. "That would not be possible. Teams are unable to cancel (a) Grand Prix. We race in an international series called the FIA Formula 1 World Championship, and it is therefore for the FIA to offer the teams guidance on these issues."
Bahrain's Sunni rulers want to see the race go off as part of their efforts to show the divided country is on the road to recovery. But while much of the country is safe, many Shiite villages on the outskirts of the capital Manama are scenes of nightly clashes between security forces in riot gear often using tear gas and stun grenades against rock and fire bomb-throwing protesters.
An explosion Monday injured at least seven Bahraini policemen, officials said, in the latest report of violence between the two sides.
Protesters haven't targeted the circuit so far but they have shut down major highways and have used opposition to the race to rally their supporters β incorporating anti-F1 chants into their marches, plastering anti-Formula One posters on walls and criticizing Ecclestone and race drivers on social media websites.
The crackdown on anti-government protests last year left at least 50 people dead.
This is because of sensationalists who want "mess" to go down and you are all falling into their ploy.the race itself could prove to be a catalyst for something far worse.
You appear to have missed all the discussion of the last week. The race has ceased to be a sporting event and become a political issue.n smikle wrote:Why shouldn't it? What harm does F1do? Only people can do harm to themselves not the sport.
F1 simply cannot stay neutral because Al-Khalifa has already politicised the GP. Using F1 for political purposes is prohibited by the FiA code. The Turks have been punished heavily for much smaller transgressions. So apart from the security concerns we also have an internal FiA motive to cancel the race.If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.