Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Pup
Pup
50
Joined: 08 May 2008, 17:45

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Well it caused problems for the guys who knew better than to go off line, too.

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Giblet wrote:Image
Interesting thought occurs - had that Red Bull had a stalled front wing like on the Mercedes then would it have pitched back down like that or would it have flipped?

Lycoming
Lycoming
106
Joined: 25 Aug 2011, 22:58

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Irrelevant, DRS was not activated. In any case it probably would have had the same result, perhaps with a bit more rise. The stalled front wing just drops downforce a bit. Crucially, it does not add lift. The car would have to go past 90 degrees vertical and it is nowhere near doing so here.

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

[Never mind. It's a new day.]
Last edited by bhall on 15 Apr 2012, 22:53, edited 1 time in total.

Goran2812
Goran2812
27
Joined: 28 Mar 2010, 22:58
Location: Germany, BW

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Just a taught about Webber and his racing that came to my mind while watching todays race... I'm sure many will agree... The guy is so precise when in battle for position... Surgically precise to be exact... It's actually quite amazing to watch him battle with the others and see him drive 10 cm by the side of the other guy and be able to react so quick and adjust to the situation and follow it till the end... Amazing
Visit my photo page! -> http://www.gorankphoto.com/formula1

myurr
myurr
9
Joined: 20 Mar 2008, 21:58

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Lycoming wrote:Irrelevant, DRS was not activated. In any case it probably would have had the same result, perhaps with a bit more rise. The stalled front wing just drops downforce a bit. Crucially, it does not add lift. The car would have to go past 90 degrees vertical and it is nowhere near doing so here.
I think you're missing the point. I know DRS was not active in this instance, but in a similar incident is possible elsewhere such as two cars coming together during an overtake, or with someone running wide during qualifying.

It also doesn't matter about the stalled wing not producing lift, the floor will provide enough lift at that angle. The only reason the nose came back down on Webber's car was because the front wing had enough downforce to counteract the lift generated by the rest of that car at that angle of attack. The stalling of the wing will reduce that lift and increase the likelihood of it taking off and flipping like we've seen some cars do in other series.

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

It also be because Webber got out of the throttle.

sAx
sAx
1
Joined: 08 Dec 2007, 13:38

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Goran2812 wrote:Just a taught about Webber and his racing that came to my mind while watching todays race... I'm sure many will agree... The guy is so precise when in battle for position... Surgically precise to be exact... It's actually quite amazing to watch him battle with the others and see him drive 10 cm by the side of the other guy and be able to react so quick and adjust to the situation and follow it till the end... Amazing
Someone (Button?) said something similar recently i.e. Webber is the toughest race out there and does not give 1mm more than is absolutely necessary.

sAx
Integrity, Trust, Respect.

Follow me: http://twitter.com/#!/sAx247

Nando
Nando
2
Joined: 10 Mar 2012, 02:30

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

what i like with Webber is as Goran mentioned. A clean driver even in the fiercest of battles.

But also, his fighting spirit. He´s a true fighter like Hamilton and Alonso.

Funny that you mention that Goran, my commentator said the same thing when not passing Vettel but there was someone he passed on the outside of T6.
"Il Phenomeno" - The one they fear the most!

"2% of the world's population own 50% of the world's wealth."

red748
red748
0
Joined: 30 May 2011, 23:51
Location: London

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Shrieker wrote:@ myurr,

They haven't fixed the excessive marbling problem however.
Shoot me down, if you feel inclined to, but I feel that
the marbles were excessive today and overtaking suffered
as a result.

foxmulder_ms
foxmulder_ms
1
Joined: 10 Feb 2011, 20:36

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Awesome race. Mclaren was soooo wrong with their 3-pit-stop strategy but luckily has a really fast car.

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

red748 wrote:
Shrieker wrote:@ myurr,

They haven't fixed the excessive marbling problem however.
Shoot me down, if you feel inclined to, but I feel that
the marbles were excessive today and overtaking suffered
as a result.
Count me in on that criticism. I think the tyre design is artificial and acutally a bit dangerous as witnessed by Alonso almost causing a high speed collision with one of the Saubers.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

User avatar
Hail22
144
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 07:22

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

WhiteBlue wrote:
red748 wrote:
Shrieker wrote:@ myurr,

They haven't fixed the excessive marbling problem however.
Shoot me down, if you feel inclined to, but I feel that
the marbles were excessive today and overtaking suffered
as a result.
Count me in on that criticism. I think the tyre design is artificial and acutally a bit dangerous as witnessed by Alonso almost causing a high speed collision with one of the Saubers.
Agreed, Its deplorable the amount of marbles. I don't even think in the days of the Goodyear F1 Tyres had that kind of marbling?
If someone said to me that you can have three wishes, my first would have been to get into racing, my second to be in Formula 1, my third to drive for Ferrari.

Gilles Villeneuve

jamsbong
jamsbong
0
Joined: 13 May 2007, 05:00

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Giblet wrote:Image
It looks like a funny car drag race! :lol:

Speedster
Speedster
0
Joined: 28 Mar 2012, 16:39

Re: Chinese GP 2012 - Shanghai

Post

Very interesting race. Exciting start, after that I expected a lot of action on the straight but that never really materialized, but the way the tires behaved had a big influence on the action obviously.

Great to see so many cars so close to each other. And I was happy DRS wasn't working. If it had been working, it would be nothing more than a procession from quickest to slowest probably.

Few observations. McLarens were fast, but not in the same league they looked in in the first two races, others were close. Mercedes was clearly the fastest, although the car they had on the track had clean air for 56 laps, will have also helped his tires last. Great first win for Rosberg though, well-deserved.

The shockers for me were Raikkonen and Sauber. I've no idea what Renault/Lotus/Whatever it is were thinking of but that didn't work. Raikkonen must be frustrated with the strategy, that two stop was based on an alternate universe where tires last and where there is no world hunger problem probably.

Alonso on his position today, couldn't work anything special, even made a small mistake to hold the Saubers behind him. Also glad, although I'm not a fan, to see Massa doing a relatively uneventful weekend. No result to remember, but not completely outclassed either and that might even be a positive for him.

Saubers went backwards, they might need to revise their strategy too. Their drivers were also better on Saturday than on Sunday, although Perez has been a bit erratic all weekend.

All in all very enjoyable race, great season so far. Undecided about the Bahrein discussion, but looking forward nonetheless, four weeks without racing would've been too much.