My pick for this race is Raikkonen, followed by McLaren of Button, and Alonso completing the podium...
But, I think that it'll be much clearer after FP1&2. Can't wait...
If you can read Italian well..you'd better bookmark that site because it is amazing at describing what is going on. This one particularily he goes into such detail where you start to get lost, but then he follows it up (before you are lost) with a real world example that everyone can understand. I'll translate a small portion of what Alain prost said to him:elFranZ wrote:How do you set up your car in Barcelona?
Here is the answer from Luigi Mazzola, former Ferrari test team chief:
http://www.blogf1.it/2012/05/07/gp-barc ... catalunya/
I couldn't read it fully yet, there are literally tons of infos.
Oh, it's in Italian!
Here enters the first teaching lesson that Prost gave me during his first test of Paul Ricard in France “In this track is the famous ‘Signes’ curve, very fast, and there is also the famous double right hand turn that is a lot less fast.” Not less important though is turn 1, with a quick tight turn after a long straight. Alan said “Always remember that is the fast turns I need relatively little aero downforce, but I need a perfect aero balance with no understeer or oversteer. A neutral car. What matters is the aero balance, not the aero load. I need the aero load in the slow turns, under braking, and in acceleration while the aero balance has to be the least compared to the other turns. In the slow-medium turns I need a low mechanical balance so that I can have more grip at the front and try to maintain the aero balance as low as possible”Alain Prost wrote:Qui entra in gioco il primo insegnamento di Prost che mi fece durante il primo test del Paul Ricard in Francia. In questo circuito c’è la famosa curva Signes, molto veloce, e c’è anche la famosa curva doppia a destra molto meno veloce. Non meno importante è la curva 1, che è un tornantino molto stretto dopo un rettilineo abbastanza lungo. Alain mi disse: “Ricordati sempre che nelle curve veloci mi serve relativamente poco carico aerodinamico, ma mi serve un bilancio aerodinamico perfetto, niente sottosterzo e niente sovrasterzo. Vettura neutra. Quello che conta è il bilancio, non il livello di carico. Il carico aerodinamico mi serve nelle curve lente, in frenata ed in trazione ed il bilancio aerodinamico deve essere il più basso possibile compatibilmente con il compromesso con le altre curve. Nelle curve medio – lente mi serve un bilancio meccanico basso per avere più aderenza nell’anteriore e per cercare di mantenere più basso possibile il bilancio aerodinamico”.
Absolutely great article on how you set up an F1 car. Engineer Mazzola is one of the very best and is as knowledgeable as anyone in the sport. This is fact. In the article he tries to simplify it for people not working in F1 and does a pretty good job at it.ecapox wrote:
If you can read Italian well..you'd better bookmark that site because it is amazing at describing what is going on. This one particularily he goes into such detail where you start to get lost, but then he follows it up (before you are lost) with a real world example that everyone can understand. I'll translate a small portion of what Alain prost said to him:
Here enters the first teaching lesson that Prost gave me during his first test of Paul Ricard in France “In this track is the famous ‘Signes’ curve, very fast, and there is also the famous double right hand turn that is a lot less fast.” Not less important though is turn 1, with a quick tight turn after a long straight. Alan said “Always remember that is the fast turns I need relatively little aero downforce, but I need a perfect aero balance with no understeer or oversteer. A neutral car. What matters is the aero balance, not the aero load. I need the aero load in the slow turns, under braking, and in acceleration while the aero balance has to be the least compared to the other turns. In the slow-medium turns I need a low mechanical balance so that I can have more grip at the front and try to maintain the aero balance as low as possible”
This is a great blog all around. Of course there will be those of you that poo-poo this, but that is OK. This is a great blog with amazing detail and information
wow that long ago..raymondu999 wrote:1996. I think.
Mind you don't forget - There's a 60% chance it'll rain, but even if it does rain there's no saying it will be on the circuit. My bet is on a hot, dry grand prix
where do you get that info?NAPI10 wrote:Weather looks quite interesting…chances of rain during qualifying; Drying track during Race. Going to be an exciting weekend…